Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Storage: Fix getSquashDeleteRange does not return correctly squashed key-range when using common-handle #9530

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

JaySon-Huang
Copy link
Contributor

@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang commented Oct 15, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #9529

Problem Summary:

we get the "suqash delete range" to estimate whether there are sufficient delete rows that we need to compact data in background thread.

auto actual_delete_range = snap->delta->getSquashDeleteRange().shrink(segment_range);
if (actual_delete_range.none())
return false;

In ColumnFileSetSnapshot::getSquashDeleteRange, it use the member variable is_common_handle, rowkey_column_size to generate the rowkey range.
But actually those two variable are not set correctly. is_common_handle is always false in ColumnFileSetSnapshot

RowKeyRange ColumnFileSetSnapshot::getSquashDeleteRange() const
{
RowKeyRange squashed_delete_range = RowKeyRange::newNone(is_common_handle, rowkey_column_size);
for (const auto & column_file : column_files)
{
if (auto * f_delete = column_file->tryToDeleteRange(); f_delete)
squashed_delete_range = squashed_delete_range.merge(f_delete->getDeleteRange());
}
return squashed_delete_range;
}

So when the table use common-handle, shouldCompactDeltaWithStable always returns false, and the segment background gc is not GC in timely

What is changed and how it works?

Storage: Fix `getSquashDeleteRange` does not return correctly squashed key-range when using common-handle
  • Remove unused variable ColumnFileSetSnapshot::{is_common_handle, rowkey_column_size}
  • Pass the correct is_common_handle, rowkey_column_size in function shouldCompactDeltaWithStable
  • Add check for rowkey-range is_common_handle in DMFilePackFilter

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Improve the data background GC speed on clustered-index table
提升聚簇索引的表后台回收过期数据的速度

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/needs-triage-completed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Lloyd-Pottiger Lloyd-Pottiger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. approved labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JinheLin, Lloyd-Pottiger

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [JinheLin,Lloyd-Pottiger]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ti-chi-bot bot commented Oct 15, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-10-15 09:14:46.115885779 +0000 UTC m=+348883.264795609: ☑️ agreed by Lloyd-Pottiger.
  • 2024-10-15 09:38:11.81892239 +0000 UTC m=+350288.967832214: ☑️ agreed by JinheLin.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot merged commit 5e09f4a into pingcap:master Oct 15, 2024
5 checks passed
@JaySon-Huang JaySon-Huang deleted the fix_snapshot_key branch October 15, 2024 10:26
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. labels Oct 17, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #9541.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.5: #9542.

ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflash that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. label Oct 29, 2024
ti-chi-bot pushed a commit to ti-chi-bot/tiflash that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-7.1: #9565.

ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
…d key-range when using common-handle (#9530) (#9565)

close #9529

Storage: Fix `getSquashDeleteRange` does not return correctly squashed key-range when using common-handle

Co-authored-by: JaySon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JaySon-Huang <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
…d key-range when using common-handle (#9530) (#9541)

close #9529

Storage: Fix `getSquashDeleteRange` does not return correctly squashed key-range when using common-handle

Co-authored-by: JaySon-Huang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JaySon <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
…d key-range when using common-handle (#9530) (#9542)

close #9529

Storage: Fix `getSquashDeleteRange` does not return correctly squashed key-range when using common-handle

Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: JaySon-Huang <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: JaySon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: JaySon-Huang <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lloyd-Pottiger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ti-chi-bot[bot] <108142056+ti-chi-bot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm needs-cherry-pick-release-7.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.1 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-7.5 Should cherry pick this PR to release-7.5 branch. needs-cherry-pick-release-8.1 Should cherry pick this PR to release-8.1 branch. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The gcTrySegmentMergeDelta on common handle table can not GC data correctly in timely manner
4 participants