-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix RegionKVStoreTest #6768
fix RegionKVStoreTest #6768
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
@@ -123,9 +126,9 @@ class RegionKVStoreTest : public ::testing::Test | |||
} | |||
String path = TiFlashTestEnv::getContext().getPath(); | |||
auto p = path + "/metadata/"; | |||
TiFlashTestEnv::tryRemovePath(p, /*recreate=*/true); | |||
TiFlashTestEnv::tryCreatePath(p); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why don't we clean up the existing files that the previous run may leave?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When we run two test cases in one process, the old logic will remove the folders(and their sub folders) generated by previous cases. Although the first-level folders are recreated, but the sub folders will not be recreated. Since the Context instance is already created, the initialization steps will not run in the second test case. It means the removed sub folders won't be created again, which causes exceptions by the following logic.
And seems not removing those folders won't cause problems.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
/hold for other reviewers |
/run-all-tests |
b70024c
to
a455770
Compare
/run-all-tests |
/run-integration-test |
/unhold |
/merge |
@JaySon-Huang: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: a455770
|
@flowbehappy: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests
If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
close pingcap#6767 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <[email protected]>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #6767
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note