-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 411
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add switch for disabling refined local tunnel #6683
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/cc @SeaRise @windtalker |
dbms/src/Interpreters/Settings.h
Outdated
@@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ struct Settings | |||
M(SettingUInt64, manual_compact_more_until_ms, 60000, "Continuously compact more segments until reaching specified elapsed time. If 0 is specified, only one segment will be compacted each round.") \ | |||
M(SettingUInt64, max_spilled_size_per_spill, 1024ULL * 1024 * 1024, "Max spilled data size per spill, 1GB as the default value.") \ | |||
\ | |||
M(SettingBool, enable_planner, true, "Enable planner") | |||
M(SettingBool, enable_planner, true, "Enable planner") \ | |||
M(SettingBool, enable_refined_local_tunnel, true, "Enable refined local tunnel") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can use local_tunnel_version
instead?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can use
local_tunnel_version
instead?
okk
/hold |
@hongyunyan: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: fac66cb
|
/merge |
@ywqzzy: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 5464159
|
/run-integration-test |
/run-unit-test |
…nto switch_rf_local
/run-all-tests |
/merge |
@Lloyd-Pottiger: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 5102a16
|
close pingcap#6681 Signed-off-by: ywqzzy <[email protected]>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #6681 ref #6713
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note