Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add switch for disabling refined local tunnel #6683

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Feb 7, 2023

Conversation

xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor

@xzhangxian1008 xzhangxian1008 commented Jan 29, 2023

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #6681 ref #6713

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jan 29, 2023

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • SeaRise
  • windtalker

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 29, 2023
@xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @SeaRise @windtalker

@@ -365,7 +365,8 @@ struct Settings
M(SettingUInt64, manual_compact_more_until_ms, 60000, "Continuously compact more segments until reaching specified elapsed time. If 0 is specified, only one segment will be compacted each round.") \
M(SettingUInt64, max_spilled_size_per_spill, 1024ULL * 1024 * 1024, "Max spilled data size per spill, 1GB as the default value.") \
\
M(SettingBool, enable_planner, true, "Enable planner")
M(SettingBool, enable_planner, true, "Enable planner") \
M(SettingBool, enable_refined_local_tunnel, true, "Enable refined local tunnel")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can use local_tunnel_version instead?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we can use local_tunnel_version instead?

okk

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 31, 2023
@xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 1, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 1, 2023
@xzhangxian1008 xzhangxian1008 requested review from windtalker and SeaRise and removed request for SeaRise and windtalker February 1, 2023 02:53
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 2, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2023
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@hongyunyan: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: fac66cb

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 7, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 7, 2023
@ywqzzy
Copy link
Contributor

ywqzzy commented Feb 7, 2023

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ywqzzy: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5464159

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 7, 2023
@xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-integration-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 7, 2023
@xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-unit-test

@xzhangxian1008
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@Lloyd-Pottiger
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@Lloyd-Pottiger: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5102a16

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Feb 7, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 2830317 into pingcap:master Feb 7, 2023
@xzhangxian1008 xzhangxian1008 deleted the switch_rf_local branch February 7, 2023 14:13
ywqzzy pushed a commit to ywqzzy/tiflash_1 that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add switch for disabling refined local tunnel
8 participants