use the right way to wait tiflash replica ready in least_greatest.test

[windtalker]

Signed-off-by: xufei [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #4316

Problem Summary:
As the issue described.

What is changed and how it works?

The root cause is least_greatest.test use a wrong way to wait tiflash replica ready, so actually the wait is timeout after 600 seconds.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• solotzg
• yibin87

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[yibin87]

LGTM

[solotzg]

Can we modify the scripts to check syntax ? Someone else may make same mistake.

[windtalker]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

@windtalker: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 5e0e2ba

[sre-bot]

Coverage for changed files

no c/c++ source change detected

Coverage summary

Functions  MissedFunctions  Executed  Lines   MissedLines  Cover
16971      9542             43.77%    191209  96831        49.36%

full coverage report (for internal network access only)

[windtalker]

Can we modify the scripts to check syntax ? Someone else may make same mistake.

Yes, I think we need to improve this.