Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the problem that expired data was not recycled timely due to slow gc speed (#4224) #4253

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4224

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #4146

Problem Summary: The current gc speed is too slow and the data cannot be reclaimed timely when corresponding region was scheduled to other nodes.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

fix the problem that expired data was not recycled timely due to slow gc speed

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member Author

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Mar 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.2 labels Mar 14, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 14, 2022
@lidezhu
Copy link
Contributor

lidezhu commented Mar 14, 2022

This change is merged into #3695. Close it.

@lidezhu lidezhu closed this Mar 14, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. labels Apr 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-5.2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants