Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

placement: return state instead of schedule #55942

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2024

Conversation

GMHDBJD
Copy link
Contributor

@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD commented Sep 9, 2024

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #55945

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue do-not-merge/needs-tests-checked release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

tiprow bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Hi @GMHDBJD. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@GMHDBJD
Copy link
Contributor Author

GMHDBJD commented Sep 9, 2024

/retest

@GMHDBJD
Copy link
Contributor Author

GMHDBJD commented Sep 9, 2024

/check-issue-triage-complete

Copy link

tiprow bot commented Sep 9, 2024

@GMHDBJD: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added approved needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.0398%. Comparing base (2d1ed88) to head (1bdd4e6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #55942         +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage   72.8458%   56.0398%   -16.8060%     
=================================================
  Files          1604       1729        +125     
  Lines        445737     621188     +175451     
=================================================
+ Hits         324701     348113      +23412     
- Misses       101008     249381     +148373     
- Partials      20028      23694       +3666     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 37.2777% <0.0000%> (?)
unit 71.9627% <0.0000%> (+0.0068%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
dumpling 52.9567% <ø> (ø)
parser ∅ <ø> (∅)
br 52.8168% <ø> (+7.0793%) ⬆️

Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 9, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lcwangchao, xhebox

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added lgtm and removed needs-1-more-lgtm Indicates a PR needs 1 more LGTM. labels Sep 9, 2024
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 9, 2024

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

  • 2024-09-09 06:07:56.578785553 +0000 UTC m=+250146.319209515: ☑️ agreed by xhebox.
  • 2024-09-09 06:17:18.542912901 +0000 UTC m=+250708.283336834: ☑️ agreed by lcwangchao.

@GMHDBJD
Copy link
Contributor Author

GMHDBJD commented Sep 9, 2024

/check-issue-triage-complete

@GMHDBJD GMHDBJD merged commit 499e45f into pingcap:master Sep 9, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@lcwangchao lcwangchao linked an issue Sep 9, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved lgtm release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

show placement always pending
3 participants