-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size
to negative numbers (#55327)
#55380
planner: add protection to avoid setting tot_col_size
to negative numbers (#55327)
#55380
Conversation
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, qw4990 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/test unit-test |
@qw4990: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/[email protected] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-6.5 #55380 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 73.6390%
================================================
Files ? 1097
Lines ? 352468
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 259554
Misses ? 76216
Partials ? 16698 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #55327
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #55126
Problem Summary: planner: add protection to avoid setting
tot_col_size
to negative numbersWhat changed and how does it work?
See more details and analysis in the issue.
When updating
tot_col_size
, useGREATEST
to protect it from becoming a negative number.Hard to use UT to test it, so I tested it manually locally:
First I hacked the code below to simulate all positive updates on
tot_col_size
are lost:Then execute those SQLs:
Then we can see the
tot_col_size
becomes a negative number:After this PR, this case won't happen, at least we can ensure it's equal or larger than
0
:Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.