-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
executor: sync deletable columns to binlog when remove record #53617
Conversation
Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #53617 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 72.4359% 74.6091% +2.1732%
================================================
Files 1506 1506
Lines 430579 433369 +2790
================================================
+ Hits 311894 323333 +11439
+ Misses 99367 90086 -9281
- Partials 19318 19950 +632
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/retest |
pkg/table/tables/tables.go
Outdated
deletableCols := t.DeletableCols() | ||
for i, d := range deletableData { | ||
dCol := deletableCols[i] | ||
if dCol.State == model.StatePublic { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
suppose we are dropping/lossy-modify a column, this list won't contains the changed column while binlog think the column exist, not sure if binlog
can handle it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For lossy modifying a column, it consists of two steps:
1. add a hidden column
2. drop the old column
Since DDL is only synced when the job state is done, the hidden column does not exists in downstream.
@@ -1368,7 +1368,7 @@ func (t *TableCommon) RemoveRecord(ctx table.MutateContext, h kv.Handle, r []typ | |||
memBuffer.Release(sh) | |||
|
|||
if shouldWriteBinlog(ctx.GetSessionVars(), t.meta) { | |||
cols := t.Cols() | |||
cols := t.DeletableCols() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consistent with
tidb/pkg/planner/core/logical_plan_builder.go
Lines 4893 to 4895 in afd2343
} else if b.inDeleteStmt { | |
// DeletableCols returns all columns of the table in deletable states. | |
columns = tbl.DeletableCols() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
when add column
this list will contain the new column that binlog
does not know now, can binlog handle it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Drainer can handle it correctly by only decoding necessary(public) columns:
https://github.com/pingcap/tidb-binlog/blob/6fba4f883a0c6c7e0d68b3b8aef1a53d9454b273/drainer/translator/mysql.go#L88-L90
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: D3Hunter, wjhuang2016 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #53133
Problem Summary:
Previously, when TiDB writes delete records to binlog, column count of schema and data mismatch. This is because only public columns are selected, while data includes all deletable columns.
What changed and how does it work?
Make schema use all deletable columns.
Check List
Tests
https://github.com/pingcap/tidb-binlog/blob/6fba4f883a0c6c7e0d68b3b8aef1a53d9454b273/drainer/translator/mysql.go#L88-L90
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.