*: speed up create table and reduce memory usage when the number of tables is relatively large (#49371)

[ti-chi-bot]

This is an automated cherry-pick of #49371

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #49370

Problem Summary:
ListTables took a lot of time when the number of tables was relatively large

What changed and how does it work?

Because the unmarshal of the TableInfo structure takes a large proportion of time, we only needn't all structures of the TableInfo. So we use TableNameInfo instead of it.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)

Memory usage
Before this PR, when the 113k table is created, TiDB OOM (14G+) appears.
After this PR, the maximum memory of TiDB is nearly 6.9G when creating 113k tables, and the maximum memory usage is 11G when 400k tables are created

Time taken
Execute checkTableNotExistsFromStore function consumption of time.

Total Table Count	Current DB Table Count	Master Branch Take Time	After this PR Table Time
437k	215k	23-26s	12-14s

Master branch info:

After this PR info(The middle area is particularly high because the owner of another service is transferred):

• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 60.86957% with 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Please upload report for BASE (release-7.5@3841026). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             release-7.5     #53545   +/-   ##
================================================
  Coverage               ?   71.9860%           
================================================
  Files                  ?       1411           
  Lines                  ?     410299           
  Branches               ?          0           
================================================
  Hits                   ?     295358           
  Misses                 ?      95065           
  Partials               ?      19876           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	71.9860% <60.8695%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9913% <0.0000%> (?)
parser	∅ <0.0000%> (?)
br	53.4086% <0.0000%> (?)

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-05-24 11:13:00.972395144 +0000 UTC m=+2429334.729530715: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.
• 2024-05-24 11:48:03.440783902 +0000 UTC m=+2431437.197919467: ☑️ agreed by tangenta.

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hawkingrei, lance6716, tangenta

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [tangenta]
• pkg/meta/OWNERS [tangenta]
• pkg/parser/OWNERS [tangenta]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[3AceShowHand]

/test all

[tiprow]

@3AceShowHand: No presubmit jobs available for pingcap/[email protected]

In response to this:

/test all

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.