ddl: do not reference owner_id for specific system DDL

[tangenta]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #53327

Problem Summary:

In #53234, TiDB fails to execute below upgrade DDL, because it needs to access owner_id from tidb_mdl_info.

ALTER TABLE mysql.tidb_mdl_info ADD COLUMN owner_id VARCHAR(64) NOT NULL DEFAULT '';

What changed and how does it work?

For the DDLs related to system tables, we skip using owner_id field to prevent above DDL failed.

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  1. Prepare a v8.0.0 cluster.
  2. Kill v8.0.0 TiDB server.
  3. Start latest(compiled from this PR) TiDB server.
  4. Execute upgrade process normally. It can also serve users' DDL.
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Since this bug is not released to any versions, release-note is not necessary.

[tiprow]

Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.00000% with 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 74.4894%. Comparing base (cc127c1) to head (c97a7ce).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##             master     #53332        +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage   74.4290%   74.4894%   +0.0604%     
================================================
  Files          1497       1498         +1     
  Lines        356920     430892     +73972     
================================================
+ Hits         265652     320969     +55317     
- Misses        71938      89971     +18033     
- Partials      19330      19952       +622     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	48.7288% <48.0000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components	Coverage Δ
dumpling	53.9957% <ø> (-2.3014%)	⬇️
parser	∅ <ø> (∅)
br	50.4482% <ø> (+7.4895%)	⬆️

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, wjhuang2016

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• pkg/ddl/OWNERS [wjhuang2016]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2024-05-16 08:58:00.933089153 +0000 UTC m=+1730034.690224726: ☑️ agreed by wjhuang2016.
• 2024-05-16 09:20:56.030094533 +0000 UTC m=+1731409.787230104: ☑️ agreed by lance6716.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch release-8.1: #53334.