executor: add failpoints to control chunk size #52960
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
release-note-none
|
Hi @ekexium. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
| @@ -89,6 +90,9 @@ func newExecutorChunkAllocator(vars *variable.SessionVars, retFieldTypes []*type | |||
|
|
|||
| // InitCap returns the initial capacity for chunk | |||
| func (e *executorChunkAllocator) InitCap() int { | |||
| failpoint.Inject("initCap", func (val failpoint.Value) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dose it mean the chunk size would be a constant value If the initCap is set to a value same with maxChunkSize using both two failpoints?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes that's my expectation. I do this primarily because I don't want to make initCap > maxChunkSize, which doesn't make sense, though the allocator code actually handles this case well.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #52960 +/- ##
=================================================
- Coverage 72.3850% 56.0354% -16.3496%
=================================================
Files 1482 1596 +114
Lines 428662 601093 +172431
=================================================
+ Hits 310287 336825 +26538
- Misses 99083 241223 +142140
- Partials 19292 23045 +3753
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
ekexium
force-pushed
the
failpoint-max-chunk-size
branch
from
e150922 to
e77c43b
Compare
Signed-off-by: ekexium <[email protected]>
ekexium
force-pushed
the
failpoint-max-chunk-size
branch
from
e77c43b to
220308d
Compare
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
approved
needs-1-more-lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cfzjywxk, zyguan The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ti-chi-bot
bot
added
lgtm
and removed
needs-1-more-lgtm
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #50215
Problem Summary:
We need to make chunk small enough to trigger multiple flushes in tests.
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.