-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: fix the incorrect judgment of correlated column in the having clause (#51849) #51975
planner: fix the incorrect judgment of correlated column in the having clause (#51849) #51975
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-7.5 #51975 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 71.9849%
================================================
Files ? 1408
Lines ? 409098
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 294489
Misses ? 94788
Partials ? 19821
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AilinKid, hawkingrei The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
This is an automated cherry-pick of #51849
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #51107
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
the fields in the having clause should be a correlated column unrelated to select fields and group-by fields.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.