-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
importinto: calculate writer mem size using step resource & add a option for test #51486
Conversation
Hi @D3Hunter. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #51486 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.7359% 73.4486% +2.7126%
================================================
Files 1462 1467 +5
Lines 435442 443717 +8275
================================================
+ Hits 308014 325904 +17890
+ Misses 108116 97806 -10310
- Partials 19312 20007 +695
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
update result of merge-sort |
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ func getSortedKVMetasForIngest(planCtx planner.PlanCtx) (map[string]*external.So | |||
for kvGroup, kvMeta := range kvMetasOfEncodeStep { | |||
// only part of kv files are merge sorted. we need to merge kv metas that | |||
// are not merged into the kvMetasOfMergeSort. | |||
if skipMergeSort(kvGroup, kvMeta.MultipleFilesStats) { | |||
if !p.Plan.ForceMergeStep && skipMergeSort(kvGroup, kvMeta.MultipleFilesStats) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe we can remove the failpoint, ForceMergeStep
seems cover all calling
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i deleted it once, but find that some test only want to skip for some kv group
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lance6716, tangenta The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@D3Hunter: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #49008
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
before this pr, import 1t data
after, the time to encode and ingest is similar, the checksum time increase, but it's not related to this pr change
with this pr, run import 1t with merge-step, success
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.