-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ddl: fix unstable test TestCreateDropCreateTable #50076
ddl: fix unstable test TestCreateDropCreateTable #50076
Conversation
Hi @tangenta. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #50076 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 70.7820% 72.7926% +2.0105%
================================================
Files 1467 1467
Lines 436396 437267 +871
================================================
+ Hits 308890 318298 +9408
+ Misses 108168 98944 -9224
- Partials 19338 20025 +687
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
/retest |
@wuhuizuo I need to trigger CI to reproduce the issue. |
/run-unit-test |
1e6ac4a
to
93082a4
Compare
68af0d4
to
66ed429
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bb7133, wjhuang2016 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #50061
Problem Summary:
There is a gap between
runningJobs.remove()
and nextrunningJobs.add()
. IfgetJob()
is invoked during this gap, DDL worker may execute the secondcreate table
job first.What changed and how does it work?
This PR distinguishes the concept between "processing" jobs and "unfinished" jobs:
synced
,done
, orrollback done
.For
checkRunnable()
, we should use "unfinished jobs" to determine the dependency.Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.