Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: don't change the multi stage count's final return type (#48675) #48931

Conversation

ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This is an automated cherry-pick of #48675

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #48643

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test
    • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

planner: don't change the multi stage count's final return type

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR. labels Nov 27, 2023
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gmhdbjd for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Nov 27, 2023
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2023
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Nov 27, 2023

@ti-chi-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/unit-test fd27fde link true /test unit-test
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev_2 fd27fde link true /test check-dev2
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/check_dev fd27fde link true /test check-dev
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mysql-test fd27fde link true /test mysql-test
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/build fd27fde link true /test build

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@winoros
Copy link
Member

winoros commented Nov 28, 2023

The auto pick has too many conflicts. Used another handmade instead.

@winoros winoros closed this Nov 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. ok-to-test Indicates a PR is ready to be tested. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. type/cherry-pick-for-release-6.5 This PR is cherry-picked to release-6.5 from a source PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants