Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ddl, session: fix re-upgrade issues #44469
ddl, session: fix re-upgrade issues #44469
Changes from 3 commits
aee3cfd
0fec4eb
35a2e85
e50bf5c
1291ed3
1e531f1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we use the
session
but nottxn
here, or another session? It would be better use the same mechamism in certain routing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is because this method of
FinishBootstrap
call requirestxn
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like that would be better to do the real upgrade but not mock since it will be more like user's action.
And, the
mock
here normally seems being a litlle bit complex since there are cases that we may not know what will be going to happen in the future because the behavior of 'job.AdminOperator' may be changed by its module. In another word, the case here involves the inside-logic of 'admin pause' which may introduce unknow error in future.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but the test should fail if the internal implementation changes, so just modify the test. And the way I've come up with mocks so far is this. Do you have any other suggestions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be better that different column is with different kind of type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a simple test, hopefully a system DDL job. I don't feel the need to consider these types.