-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: fix join reorder will append remained other condition to an outer join #44409
planner: fix join reorder will append remained other condition to an outer join #44409
Conversation
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
@@ -507,6 +507,13 @@ func (s *baseSingleGroupJoinOrderSolver) makeJoin(leftPlan, rightPlan LogicalPla | |||
remainOtherConds, otherConds = expression.FilterOutInPlace(remainOtherConds, func(expr expression.Expression) bool { | |||
return expression.ExprFromSchema(expr, mergedSchema) | |||
}) | |||
if (joinType.JoinType == LeftOuterJoin || joinType.JoinType == RightOuterJoin || joinType.JoinType == LeftOuterSemiJoin || joinType.JoinType == AntiLeftOuterSemiJoin) && len(otherConds) > 0 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about fullOuter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no full outer join type internally
Signed-off-by: AilinKid <[email protected]>
be5a9c5
to
2b80079
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@elsa0520: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/lgtm |
@elsa0520: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: chrysan, elsa0520, winoros The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
Signed-off-by: ti-chi-bot <[email protected]>
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #44314
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
As mentioned in the last comment on the issue
Reason: outer join's other condition influence is quite different from inner join's other condition, the latter one functions as a simple filter, just integrated with inner join. The former functions as a simple filter but also decides whether the outer join is matched or not, consequently deciding whether appending an additional null (which means this row itself is not pruned in the final result)
So when enumerating join order when encountering inner join combined with outer join, those original other conditions bonded with an outer join, just let it be; those additional remained other conditions shouldn't be put down into it, adding additional selection above is a resolution.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.