dockerfile: use rockylinux

[hawkingrei]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #38933

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  make docker
• No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• Defined2014
• xhebox

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[xhebox]

LGTM, but one thing, releasing is not using this file. I don't think changing this makes any difference other than using glibc.

[hawkingrei]

LGTM, but one thing, releasing is not using this file. I don't think changing this makes any difference other than using glibc.

I agree with you. But it might be some compliance issue.

[xhebox]

LGTM, but one thing, releasing is not using this file. I don't think changing this makes any difference other than using glibc.

I agree with you. But it might be some compliance issue.

Clearly, that is not a problem. Because I am using musl. If there is any problem, I will fix it. 😄

And, go does not have much left problems on musl libc. Talking about containers for go programs, alpine is the best choice.

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 4d04a0f

[sre-bot]

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [3] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name	Result	Duration	Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test	🔴 failed 1, success 5, total 6	46 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test	🔴 failed 1, success 38, total 39	20 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test	🔴 failed 1, success 0, total 1	11 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	18 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test	🟢 all 17 tests passed	15 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test	🟢 all 11 tests passed	10 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2	🟢 all 28 tests passed	5 min 49 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1	🟢 all 26 tests passed	4 min 40 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	3 min 2 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test	🟢 build success, plugin test success	4min	Existing passed