executor: fix the missing Grantor when querying mysql.tables_priv

[CbcWestwolf]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #38293

Problem Summary:

When executing grant, we create an internal session to start internal transaction, but does not pass the user in.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No code

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

Fix a bug about missing `grantor` in `mysql.tables_priv`.

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

• xhebox
• xiongjiwei

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[xhebox]

/merge

[ti-chi-bot]

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: c19fc41

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38560.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38561.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38562.

[ti-chi-bot]

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #38563.

[sre-bot]

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [1] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name	Result	Duration	Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test	🔴 failed 1, success 37, total 38	26 min	Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test	🟢 all 6 tests passed	23 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test	🟢 all 17 tests passed	16 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test	🟢 all 11 tests passed	10 min	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	6 min 23 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2	🟢 all 28 tests passed	4 min 55 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1	🟢 all 26 tests passed	3 min 57 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	3 min 35 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test	🟢 all 1 tests passed	2 min 46 sec	Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test	🟢 build success, plugin test success	4min	Existing passed

[CbcWestwolf]

/cherry-pick-invite

[ti-chi-bot]

@CbcWestwolf Please accept the invitation then you can push to the cherry-pick pull requests.
Comment with "/cherry-pick-invite" if the invitation is expired.
https://github.com/ti-chi-bot/tidb/invitations