Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: Expression memory trace #37624

Merged
merged 24 commits into from
Sep 7, 2022

Conversation

fzzf678
Copy link
Contributor

@fzzf678 fzzf678 commented Sep 5, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Get the memory usage of the Expression.

Issue Number: ref #37632

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Sep 5, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • Reminiscent
  • qw4990

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 5, 2022
@fzzf678 fzzf678 marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2022 05:59
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2022
Comment on lines 605 to 607
if sf.Function == nil {
sum += sf.Function.MemoryUsage()
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need we to handle this when the sf.Function != nil?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need we to handle this when the sf.Function != nil?

You are right, we have handle nil in the inner MemoryUsage()

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Sep 6, 2022
}

sum = emptyBaseBuiltinFunc + b.bufAllocator.MemoryUsage() +
b.tp.MemoryUsage() + int64(unsafe.Sizeof(*b.childrenVectorizedOnce)) +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can childrenVectorizedOnce and childrenReversedOnce be nil?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest to define a const number for Once like const onceSize = int64(unsafe.Sizeof(Once{})) instead of copying it here.

return
}

sum = col.Column.MemoryUsage() + int64(unsafe.Sizeof(col.Data))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Better to implement MemoryUsage for Datum since it is commonly used in TiDB.

return
}

sum = emptyColumnSize + col.RetType.MemoryUsage() + int64(cap(col.hashcode))*int64(unsafe.Sizeof(*new(byte))) +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is int64(cap(col.hashcode)) enough? If I remember correctly, the size of 1 byte is always 1?

@@ -263,3 +263,13 @@ func TestGcColumnExprIsTidbShard(t *testing.T) {
shardExpr := NewFunctionInternal(ctx, ast.TiDBShard, ft, col)
require.True(t, GcColumnExprIsTidbShard(shardExpr))
}

func TestColumnMemoryUsage(t *testing.T) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about combining all these tests as one like TestExpressionMemoryUsage?

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Sep 6, 2022

PTAL @XuHuaiyu @wshwsh12

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Sep 7, 2022
@qw4990 qw4990 added the sig/planner SIG: Planner label Sep 7, 2022
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Sep 7, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 316b2d3

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Sep 7, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit e0b5fa1 into pingcap:master Sep 7, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Sep 7, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🟢 all 37 tests passed 25 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🟢 all 17 tests passed 14 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🟢 all 11 tests passed 13 min Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 7 min 25 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 5 min 3 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 4 min 42 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 4 min 23 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 36 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 5 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/planner SIG: Planner size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants