Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

executor: do not acqurie pessimistic lock for non-unique index keys (#36229) #36561

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 25, 2022

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Jul 26, 2022

cherry-pick #36229 to release-6.1
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/36561

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/36561:release-6.1-87c5b5068ab8

Signed-off-by: ekexium [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #36235

Problem Summary:

Fix the condition of checking if the index KV is unique or not.

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

bugfix: do not acquire pessimistic lock for non-unique index keys

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Jul 26, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • cfzjywxk
  • tiancaiamao

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jul 26, 2022
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. type/6.1-cherry-pick labels Jul 26, 2022
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ekexium you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@sre-bot
Copy link
Contributor

sre-bot commented Jul 26, 2022

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. labels Jul 26, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Aug 1, 2022
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@TonsnakeLin: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@VelocityLight VelocityLight added cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Aug 19, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Aug 22, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. labels Aug 25, 2022
@cfzjywxk
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 0744ca9

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Nov 24, 2022
@VelocityLight VelocityLight added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. and removed cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved labels Nov 25, 2022
@Ivy-YinSu
Copy link

/run-mysql-test

@Ivy-YinSu
Copy link

/run-check_dev
/run-unit-test

@Ivy-YinSu
Copy link

/run-check_dev

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@Ivy-YinSu
Copy link

/run-unit-test

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 1f143c6 into pingcap:release-6.1 Nov 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/6.1-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants