txn: refactor ts acquisition within build and execute phases #35376
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
|
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
ti-chi-bot
added
do-not-merge/needs-linked-issue
release-note-none
SpadeA-Tang
changed the title
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
|
Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/1092f636253b4a7af28202aa2f8176e8f226e145 |
lcwangchao
reviewed
Jun 15, 2022
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot
added
the
needs-rebase
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
ti-chi-bot
removed
the
needs-rebase
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
|
/run-unit-test |
ekexium
reviewed
Jun 23, 2022
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
TonsnakeLin
reviewed
Jun 23, 2022
| // Note: For point get and batch point get (name it plan), if one of the ancestor node is update/delete/physicalLock, | ||
| // we should check whether the plan.Lock is true or false. See comments in needNotToBeOptimized. | ||
| // inLockOrWriteStmt = true means one of the ancestor node is update/delete/physicalLock. | ||
| func optimizeForNotFetchingLatestTS(plan plannercore.Plan, inLockOrWriteStmt bool) bool { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe change "optimizeForNotFetchingLatestTS" to "notNeedGetLatesTSFromPD", it looks better to understand, and I don't recommend using negated words as function names.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Okey,I will change it.
| case *plannercore.BatchPointGetPlan: | ||
| return !inLockOrWriteStmt || v.Lock | ||
| case plannercore.PhysicalPlan: | ||
| if v.Children() == nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think you can remove this if v.Children() == nil block, for range can process nil
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It returns false if v.Chilren() == nil.
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
ekexium
approved these changes
Jun 24, 2022
ti-chi-bot
added
status/LGT2
|
/run-build |
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
|
/merge |
|
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 0d3e267
|
ti-chi-bot
added
the
status/can-merge
Signed-off-by: SpadeA-Tang <[email protected]>
…to removeTxnForUpdateTS
ti-chi-bot
removed
the
status/can-merge
|
/merge |
|
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 1092f63
|
ti-chi-bot
added
the
status/can-merge
TiDB MergeCI notify
|
morgo
added a commit
to morgo/tidb
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2022
* upstream/master: (57 commits) types: fix incompatible implementation of jsonpath extraction (pingcap#35320) planner: fix TRACE PLAN TARGET = 'estimation' panic when meeting partition table (pingcap#35743) *: Add `testfork.RunTest` to run multiple tests in one function (pingcap#35746) sessionctx/variable: add tests to ensure skipInit can be removed (pingcap#35703) helper: request another PD if one of them is unavailable (pingcap#35750) metrics: add cached table related metrics to grafana panel (pingcap#34718) expression: use cloned RetType at `evaluateExprWithNull` when it may be changed. (pingcap#35759) executor: fix left join on partition table generate invalid lock key (pingcap#35732) readme: remove adopters (pingcap/docs#8725) (pingcap#35124) *: only add default value for final aggregation to fix the aggregate push down (partition) union case (pingcap#35443) planner: fix the wrong cost formula of MPPExchanger on cost model ver2 (pingcap#35718) sessionctx: support encoding and decoding statement context (pingcap#35688) txn: refactor ts acquisition within build and execute phases (pingcap#35376) ddl: for schema-level DDL method parameter is now XXXStmt (pingcap#35722) *: enable gofmt (pingcap#35721) planner: disable collate clause support for enum or set column (pingcap#35684) *: Provide a util to "pause" session in uint test (pingcap#35529) ddl: implement the core for multi-schema change (pingcap#35429) parser: XXXDatabaseStmt now use CIStr for DB name (pingcap#35668) *: remove real tikv test on github actions (pingcap#35710) ...
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #35377
Problem Summary:
Although we have transaction context provider now, we still update and get
forUpdateTSfromTransactionContext. For example,updateForUpdateTSIfNeededwill updateforUpdateTSinTransactionContextin some cases, and we will getforUpdateTSfromTransactionContextsometimes but not from transaction context provider.It also fixes the bug in the AdviseOptimizeWithPlan within Pessimistic RR where old implementation can omit some cases.
What is changed and how it works?
In build and execute phases, we use context provider to get for update ts if needed.
updateForUpdateTSIfNeededis removed and the update offorUpdateTSinTransactionContextis only performed by the relevant provider.Check List
Tests