-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ddl: improve test to avoid cycle import #32058
Conversation
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
/run-unit-test |
aa1e5eb
to
a1a5e91
Compare
Code Coverage Details: https://codecov.io/github/pingcap/tidb/commit/95db553c7fe51fc120151b8a19af69828c43010f |
6b1ee83
to
26becb4
Compare
8a254c8
to
de23f2b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang <[email protected]>
2754038
to
74d9222
Compare
/run-unit-test |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 927b14f
|
@hawkingrei: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
) | ||
|
||
// GetTableByName gets table by name for test. | ||
func GetTableByName(t *testing.T, tk *testkit.TestKit, db, table string) table.Table { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please describe how moving out these methods resolve cycle import?
IMO it's quite a bit clumsy now to write GetTableByName(t, tk, ...)
instead of tk.GetTableByName(...)
.
Also, this PR is blank to describe the background and motivation to make a non-trivial change. It confuses.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have a feature branch and add some test cases. but we find some import cycles when adding test cases for example domain
, table
, and so on. so we think we should add less dependency in the testkit
pkg. and put more dependency into other package.
Signed-off-by: Weizhen Wang [email protected]
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: ref #31716
Problem Summary:
What is changed and how it works?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note