Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: fix panic when the join key is scalarFunction (#30002) #30778

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2021

Conversation

ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor

@ti-srebot ti-srebot commented Dec 16, 2021

cherry-pick #30002 to release-5.0
You can switch your code base to this Pull Request by using git-extras:

# In tidb repo:
git pr https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/pull/30778

After apply modifications, you can push your change to this PR via:

git push [email protected]:ti-srebot/tidb.git pr/30778:release-5.0-05ccb8a206da

Signed-off-by: yisaer [email protected]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #29401

Problem Summary:

If one side of the join key is string, and the another is json, the expression of the string would be cast to json and marked ParseToJSONFlag which will let WrapWithCastAsJSON wrap extra cast function.

In order to avoid this problem, we remove ParseToJSONFlag temporary during updateEQCond.

The final explain info result for the original issue is like following:

mysql> explain select /*+ inl_hash_join(t1) */ * from t t1 join t t2 on t1.b=t2.e;
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id                          | estRows  | task      | access object | operator info                                                                                                 |
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| HashJoin_8                  | 12500.00 | root      |               | inner join, equal:[eq(Column#15, test.t.e)]                                                                   |
| ├─TableReader_14(Build)     | 10000.00 | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_13                                                                                         |
| │ └─TableFullScan_13        | 10000.00 | cop[tikv] | table:t2      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo                                                                                |
| └─Projection_10(Probe)      | 10000.00 | root      |               | test.t.id, test.t.a, test.t.b, test.t.c, test.t.d, test.t.e, test.t.f, cast(test.t.b, json BINARY)->Column#15 |
|   └─TableReader_12          | 10000.00 | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_11                                                                                         |
|     └─TableFullScan_11      | 10000.00 | cop[tikv] | table:t1      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo                                                                                |
+-----------------------------+----------+-----------+---------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
6 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

What is changed and how it works?

This request fixs this case.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test

Release note

Fix the bug that sql got cancel if including json column joins char column.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Dec 16, 2021

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • XuHuaiyu
  • Yisaer

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Dec 16, 2021
@ti-srebot ti-srebot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. type/5.0-cherry-pick type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. labels Dec 16, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 16, 2021
@ti-srebot
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Yisaer you're already a collaborator in bot's repo.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 16, 2021
Signed-off-by: yisaer <[email protected]>
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 16, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Dec 16, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Dec 16, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl added the cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. label Dec 16, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 0387a92

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Dec 16, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@ti-srebot: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 1b9e684 into pingcap:release-5.0 Dec 16, 2021
@zhouqiang-cl zhouqiang-cl added this to the v5.0.6 milestone Dec 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cherry-pick-approved Cherry pick PR approved by release team. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/bugfix This PR fixes a bug. type/5.0-cherry-pick
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants