-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: fixed a bug that prevented SPM from taking effect #23197
Conversation
/sig planner |
/cc @qw4990 |
/cc @XuHuaiyu |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
…o fix_SPM_without_use_db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/LGTM
/LGTM |
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by writing |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: ea57d9c
|
/run-all-tests |
/run-check_dev_2 |
/run-unit-test |
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <[email protected]>
cherry pick to release-4.0 in PR #23209 |
Signed-off-by: ti-srebot <[email protected]>
cherry pick to release-5.0-rc in PR #23210 |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #23190
Problem Summary:
SPM does not take effect without
use database
What is changed and how it works?
What's Changed:
There is an error in the logic of obtaining binding, fix it now
How it Works:
If
ctx.GetSessionVars().CurrentDB
is "", we still restore the sql.Related changes
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Release note