-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
store/tikv: use original snapshot timestamp to resolve locks #23044
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Yilin Chen <[email protected]>
2c80f91
to
f9f4419
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/LGTM
/lgtm |
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. Reviewer can indicate their review by writing |
/merge |
@youjiali1995: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests: /run-all-tests You only need to trigger If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: f9f4419
|
store/tikv/snapshot_fail_test.go
Outdated
_, err = snapshot.Get(context.Background(), []byte("k2")) | ||
c.Assert(err, ErrorMatches, ".*key not exist") | ||
|
||
initialCommitTS := committer.commitTS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not thread-safe.
Signed-off-by: Yilin Chen <[email protected]>
…/tidb into snapshot-max-ts-resolve
@sticnarf: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
/run-all-tests |
/merge |
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. Commit hash: 1859023
|
@sticnarf: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you. At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you: /run-all-tests If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
If an auto-commit point get meets a lock, it will get a timestamp from PD as the snapshot TS in retries. But we would better not use this new TS to resolve locks the first time, because it can push forward the minCommitTS. This is an unnecessary write.
What is changed and how it works?
As @youjiali1995 suggested, we can use the original snapshot timestamp to resolve locks. Then, if the lock is not from an async-commit transaction, using
MaxUint64
ascallerStartTS
can save one write at TIKV.Check List
Tests
Release note