Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store/tikv: use original snapshot timestamp to resolve locks #23044

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 8, 2021

Conversation

sticnarf
Copy link
Contributor

@sticnarf sticnarf commented Mar 2, 2021

What problem does this PR solve?

If an auto-commit point get meets a lock, it will get a timestamp from PD as the snapshot TS in retries. But we would better not use this new TS to resolve locks the first time, because it can push forward the minCommitTS. This is an unnecessary write.

What is changed and how it works?

As @youjiali1995 suggested, we can use the original snapshot timestamp to resolve locks. Then, if the lock is not from an async-commit transaction, using MaxUint64 as callerStartTS can save one write at TIKV.

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test

Release note

  • No release note.

@sticnarf sticnarf added type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement. sig/transaction SIG:Transaction labels Mar 2, 2021
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 2, 2021
@sticnarf sticnarf force-pushed the snapshot-max-ts-resolve branch from 2c80f91 to f9f4419 Compare March 2, 2021 06:14
Copy link
Contributor

@youjiali1995 youjiali1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Mar 2, 2021
@ekexium
Copy link
Contributor

ekexium commented Mar 2, 2021

/lgtm

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • ekexium
  • youjiali1995

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by writing /lgtm in a comment.
Reviewer can cancel approval by writing /lgtm cancel in a comment.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Mar 2, 2021
@youjiali1995
Copy link
Contributor

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@youjiali1995: It seems you want to merge this PR, I will help you trigger all the tests:

/run-all-tests

You only need to trigger /merge once, and if the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

If you have any questions about the PR merge process, please refer to pr process.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: f9f4419

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 2, 2021
_, err = snapshot.Get(context.Background(), []byte("k2"))
c.Assert(err, ErrorMatches, ".*key not exist")

initialCommitTS := committer.commitTS
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not thread-safe.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot removed the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 2, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@sticnarf: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@sticnarf
Copy link
Contributor Author

sticnarf commented Mar 2, 2021

/run-all-tests

@sticnarf
Copy link
Contributor Author

sticnarf commented Mar 8, 2021

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

Commit hash: 1859023

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Mar 8, 2021
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Member

@sticnarf: Your PR was out of date, I have automatically updated it for you.

At the same time I will also trigger all tests for you:

/run-all-tests

If the CI test fails, you just re-trigger the test that failed and the bot will merge the PR for you after the CI passes.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 9a75e50 into pingcap:master Mar 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sig/transaction SIG:Transaction size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. type/enhancement The issue or PR belongs to an enhancement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants