Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: leading hint cannot take effect in UNION ALL statements #50067

Closed
qw4990 opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #50145, #50260 or #50277
Closed

planner: leading hint cannot take effect in UNION ALL statements #50067

qw4990 opened this issue Jan 4, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #50145, #50260 or #50277
Assignees
Labels
affects-6.5 This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.1 This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.5 This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.6 epic/hint report/customer Customers have encountered this bug. severity/major sig/planner SIG: Planner type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug.

Comments

@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor

qw4990 commented Jan 4, 2024

Bug Report

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue. Thanks!

1. Minimal reproduce step (Required)

create table t1 (a int);
create table t2 (a int);
create table t3 (a int);

explain
select * from t1, t2, t3
union all
select /*+ leading(t3, t2) */ * from t1, t2, t3
union all
select * from t1, t2, t3;

2. What did you expect to see? (Required)

The leading hint should take effect.

3. What did you see instead (Required)

mysql> explain
    -> select * from t1, t2, t3
    -> union all
    -> select /*+ leading(t3, t2) */ * from t1, t2, t3
    -> union all
    -> select * from t1, t2, t3;
+-----------------------------------+------------------+-----------+---------------+--------------------------------+
| id                                | estRows          | task      | access object | operator info                  |
+-----------------------------------+------------------+-----------+---------------+--------------------------------+
| Union_29                          | 3000000000000.00 | root      |               |                                |
| ├─HashJoin_31                     | 1000000000000.00 | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
| │ ├─TableReader_40(Build)         | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_39          |
| │ │ └─TableFullScan_39            | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t3      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| │ └─HashJoin_33(Probe)            | 100000000.00     | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
| │   ├─TableReader_38(Build)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_37          |
| │   │ └─TableFullScan_37          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t2      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| │   └─TableReader_36(Probe)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_35          |
| │     └─TableFullScan_35          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t1      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| ├─HashJoin_42                     | 1000000000000.00 | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
| │ ├─TableReader_51(Build)         | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_50          |
| │ │ └─TableFullScan_50            | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t3      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| │ └─HashJoin_44(Probe)            | 100000000.00     | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
| │   ├─TableReader_49(Build)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_48          |
| │   │ └─TableFullScan_48          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t2      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| │   └─TableReader_47(Probe)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_46          |
| │     └─TableFullScan_46          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t1      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
| └─HashJoin_53                     | 1000000000000.00 | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
|   ├─TableReader_62(Build)         | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_61          |
|   │ └─TableFullScan_61            | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t3      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
|   └─HashJoin_55(Probe)            | 100000000.00     | root      |               | CARTESIAN inner join           |
|     ├─TableReader_60(Build)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_59          |
|     │ └─TableFullScan_59          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t2      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
|     └─TableReader_58(Probe)       | 10000.00         | root      |               | data:TableFullScan_57          |
|       └─TableFullScan_57          | 10000.00         | cop[tikv] | table:t1      | keep order:false, stats:pseudo |
+-----------------------------------+------------------+-----------+---------------+--------------------------------+
25 rows in set (0.00 sec)

4. What is your TiDB version? (Required)

Master

@qw4990 qw4990 added type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug. sig/planner SIG: Planner epic/hint labels Jan 4, 2024
@qw4990
Copy link
Contributor Author

qw4990 commented Jan 4, 2024

@hawkingrei Could you take a look at this issue?

@hawkingrei
Copy link
Member

@hawkingrei Could you take a look at this issue?

OK, I will take a look.

@hawkingrei hawkingrei self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@hawkingrei hawkingrei added affects-6.5 This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.1 This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.5 This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions. labels Jan 6, 2024
@hawkingrei hawkingrei removed may-affects-5.4 This bug maybe affects 5.4.x versions. may-affects-6.1 labels Jan 6, 2024
@qw4990 qw4990 reopened this Jan 10, 2024
@hawkingrei hawkingrei reopened this Jan 10, 2024
@seiya-annie
Copy link

/found customer

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the report/customer Customers have encountered this bug. label Jun 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
affects-6.5 This bug affects the 6.5.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.1 This bug affects the 7.1.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.5 This bug affects the 7.5.x(LTS) versions. affects-7.6 epic/hint report/customer Customers have encountered this bug. severity/major sig/planner SIG: Planner type/bug The issue is confirmed as a bug.
Projects
None yet
4 participants