You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems the fib entry is missing the mpls label for the second pnh entry when the forwarding next hop goes out the same interface. Not sure if this is the culprit but that's what I am seeing when trying to program such a nh structure.
RIB
vtysh# show ip route 172.16.10.2/32
Routing entry for 172.16.10.2/32
Known via "bgp", distance 200, metric 0, best
Last update 00:12:59 ago
192.168.255.105 (recursive), weight 1
* 192.168.11.21, via Ethernet14, label 21, weight 1
192.168.255.106 (recursive), weight 1
* 192.168.11.21, via Ethernet14, label 22, weight 1
KERNEL
root:~# ip route show 172.16.10.2/32
172.16.10.2 nhid 184 proto bgp metric 20
nexthop encap mpls 21 via 192.168.11.21 dev Ethernet14 weight 1
nexthop encap mpls 22 via 192.168.11.21 dev Ethernet14 weight 1
It seems the fib entry is missing the mpls label for the second pnh entry when the forwarding next hop goes out the same interface. Not sure if this is the culprit but that's what I am seeing when trying to program such a nh structure.
RIB
KERNEL
FIB
Version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: