-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update footer.inc #702
Update footer.inc #702
Conversation
manual View Source is a 404 error page.
link to the manual XML file, will be a Better idea. |
I'm not sure how this fixes the problem. Could you explain? |
visit this url https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.date.php and click view source. will be 404
Use this patch will close this function on the manual page.
…---Original---
From: "Kamil ***@***.***>
Date: Sun, Sep 18, 2022 22:02 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [php/web-php] Update footer.inc (PR #702)
I'm not sure how this fixes the problem. Could you explain?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Did you by any chance mean to use |
Do you mean you inserted a ternary operator there somewhere? I cannot see it in this PR. |
We should either remove that link completely, or just use the same URL as for the "Submit a pull request" link. |
Well, then someone must be wrong; either you or me. @cmb69 Can you see a ternary operator in the code? |
The patch as is makes no sense; if the 5 first bytes equal "manual", the variable is not empty. |
The original meaning is that if there is not setting baseurl, the view source will not be displayed , set baseurl the view source will be displayed so that you can view the source code. The part I added is that this function is in the manual part, the view source code 404, so I turn off when viewing the manual. If you have a better plan, of course, you can also propose changes and improvements according to your ideas.
…---Original---
From: "Kamil ***@***.***>
Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2022 23:42 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [php/web-php] Update footer.inc (PR #702)
Do you mean you inserted a ternary operator there somewhere? I cannot see it in this PR.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I want this expression to mean that if base_url is empty, the view will not be displayed, or if it starts with "manual", it will not be displayed too. i think you can test that part localhost.
…---Original---
From: "Christoph M. ***@***.***>
Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2022 23:58 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [php/web-php] Update footer.inc (PR #702)
The patch as is makes no sense; if the 5 first bytes equal "manual", the variable is not empty.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
sorry i think i push a error patch. it's my flaw. i confused it with a ternary operator.
i will update code.
…---Original---
From: "Christoph M. ***@***.***>
Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2022 23:58 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [php/web-php] Update footer.inc (PR #702)
The patch as is makes no sense; if the 5 first bytes equal "manual", the variable is not empty.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
changed
i update the code for my idea. @kamil-tekiela |
@cmb69 @mj @kamil-tekiela , i change the code, please help me, review and approval. think you. |
Thanks. The code makes more sense now, but still isn't something that we would merge. However, I think cmb69 might be right that the solution you are proposing isn't the ideal solution. |
I have overlooked that "view source" as is makes sense for those who want to work on web-php (not doc-en). As such, @rongzedong's suggestion makes sense now, although that code should be refactored. |
We could have an |
yes. I also think it is a better solution if I can access the corresponding version of doc xml source, my solution is just a transitional solution to solve the 404 problem.
…---Original---
From: "Kamil ***@***.***>
Date: Wed, Sep 21, 2022 21:05 PM
To: ***@***.***>;
Cc: ***@***.******@***.***>;
Subject: Re: [php/web-php] Update footer.inc (PR #702)
We could have an else condition too. It would link to doc-en.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
@cmb69 i find this,: strncmp() is 20% faster than substr() :D |
Yes, I know ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! This is fine to be merged.
Looks like this has been overlooked. I've merged it now. Thank you! |
manual View Source is a 404 error page.