-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RC Test: Build an Atom v1.4.0-phetiorc.2 #801
Comments
Marking medium for the moment (since the SXSW goal was already reached) |
Yes, the SXSW goal has been reached, but I spoke with @kathy-phet after she got back from the conference and she said that there was a lot of interest in the phet-io version of BAA and she would like to have a production release of this ready to go this week (i.e. the week of March 13 2017). Also, the collaborators from Georgia Tech need an update pretty badly, please see phetsims/build-an-atom#140 (comment). Given these goals, I'd like to advocate for a higher prioritization of this task. |
Bumping to parallel top priority with proportion playground testing. |
@jbphet we can consider this done, no major bugs! Congrats! |
Thanks @phet-steele - I'll move forward with the production release. Closing. |
A new RC has been built from the 1.4-phetio branch and is ready for testing. This issue supplants the testing that was in progress for v1.4.0-phetiorc.1.
Link to the index of wrappers (this is password protected): http://www.colorado.edu/physics/phet/dev/html/build-an-atom/1.4.0-phetiorc.2/wrappers/index/
Testing Matrix:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16nsbXx_2r7_FoCxSQyZSOtLcoYs4VddA3mLfCaX3btw/edit#gid=1961266680
The changes that have been made versus v1.4.0-phetiorc.1 are not huge, but are also not trivial, so a moderate amount of focused testing is probably best. Below is the list of issues that are believed to be fixed and should be verified.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: