Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RC Test: Atomic Interactions 1.1.0-rc.1 #216

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
jbphet opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

RC Test: Atomic Interactions 1.1.0-rc.1 #216

jbphet opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jbphet
Copy link
Contributor

jbphet commented Nov 5, 2018

@KatieWoe, @ariel-phet, atomic-interactions/1.1.0-rc.1 is ready for RC testing. This is being done as part of the update of all sims in the States of Matter suite, so a fair amount of this code was verified during the test cycle for States of Matter 1.1.0. However, the standalone version of Atomic Interactions has additional features versus the Atomic Interactions screen in the States of Matter sim, and these features should be thoroughly tested.

Please document issues in https://github.com/phetsims/atomic-interactions/issues and link to this issue.

Assigning @ariel-phet for prioritization.

General RC Test

What to Test

  • Click every single button.
  • Test all possible forms of input.
    • Test all mouse/trackpad inputs.
    • Test all touchscreen inputs.
  • Make sure you can't lose anything.
  • Play with the sim normally.
  • Try to break the sim.
  • Test all query parameters on all platforms. (See QA Book for a list of query parameters.)
  • Download HTML on Chrome and iOS.
  • Make sure the iFrame version of the simulation is working as intended on all platforms.
  • Make sure the XHTML version of the simulation is working as intended on all platforms.
  • Complete the test matrix.
  • Don't forget to make sure the sim works with Legends of Learning.
  • Check this LoL spreadsheet and notify AR if it not there.

Focus and Special Instructions

Much of the code that comprises this sim was tested during the recent 1.1 release of the States of Matter simulation. However, there are some differences between this sim and how the "Atomic Interactions" screen in States of Matter looks and behaves, so the testing should focus on these differences.

Issues to Verify

These issues should have the "status:fixed-pending-testing" label. Check these issues off and close them if they are fixed. Otherwise, post a comment in the issue saying that it wasn't fixed.

Link(s)


FAQs for QA Members
There are multiple tests in this issue... Which test should I do first?

Test in order! Test the first thing first, the second thing second, and so on.


How should I format my issue?

Here's a template for making issues:

  <b>Test Device</b>

  blah

  <b>Operating System</b>

  blah

  <b>Browser</b>

  blah

  <b>Problem Description</b>

  blah

  <b>Steps to Reproduce</b>

  blah

  <b>Visuals</b>

  blah

  <details>
  <summary><b>Troubleshooting Information</b></summary>

  blah

  </details>

Who should I assign?

We typically assign the developer who opened the issue in the QA repository.


My question isn't in here... What should I do?

You should:

  1. Consult the QA Book.
  2. Google it.
  3. Ask Katie.
  4. Ask a developer.
  5. Google it again.
  6. Cry.


@KatieWoe
Copy link
Contributor

KatieWoe commented Nov 21, 2018

Edge Performance: dragging the atoms and sliders shows a fair amount of lag. This tends to happen in edge, so I'm leaving it here as a comment.

@KatieWoe
Copy link
Contributor

KatieWoe commented Nov 26, 2018

Note: This visual bug was seen on firefox, Mac 10.14. I took a picture and attempted to reproduce but have been unable to do so. As such, per @jbphet I have not made an issue. I will do so if I am able to reproduce. This comment is to record the instance to make a future issue easier to make.
img_0678
I have no idea why the picture is upside down.

@KatieWoe
Copy link
Contributor

QA is done

@jbphet
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbphet commented Dec 7, 2018

Thanks QA team. I'll follow up on the issues in the next RC. Closing.

@jbphet jbphet closed this as completed Dec 7, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants