Code Review

[samreid]

NOTE! Prior to doing a code review, copy this checklist to a GitHub issue for the repository being reviewed.
Please mark failed items with ❌

PhET code-review checklist

Build and Run Checks

• Does the sim build without warnings or errors?
• Does the html file size seem reasonable, compared to other similar sims?
• Does the sim start up? (requirejs and built versions)
• Does the sim experience any assertion failures? (run with query parameter ea)
• Does the sim pass a scenery fuzz test? (run with query parameters fuzzMouse&ea)

Memory Leaks

• Does a heap comparison using Chrome Developer Tools indicate a memory leak? (Describing this process is beyond the scope of this document.) There should be a GitHub issue showing the results of testing done by the primary developer.
• For each common-code component (sun, scenery-phet, vegas, …) that opaquely registers observers or listeners, is there a call to that component’s dispose function, or documentation about why dispose is unnecessary?
• Are there leaks due to registering observers or listeners? These guidelines should be followed, or documentation added about why following them is not necessary:
  • AXON: Property.link is accompanied by Property.unlink.
  • AXON: PropertySet.link is accompanied by PropertySet.unlink.
  • AXON: Creation of DerivedProperty is accompanied by dispose.
  • AXON: Creation of Multilink is accompanied by dispose.
  • AXON: Events.on is accompanied by Events.off.
  • AXON: Emitter.addListener is accompanied by Emitter.removeListener.
  • SCENERY: Node.on is accompanied by Node.off
  • TANDEM: tandem.addInstance is accompanied by tandem.removeInstance.
• Do all types that require a dispose function have one? This should expose a public dispose function that calls this.disposeMyType(), where disposeMyType is a private function declared in the constructor. MyType should exactly match the filename.
• PhET-iO instantiates different objects and wires up listeners that are not present in the PhET-branded simulation. It needs
  to be tested separately for memory leaks. To help isolate the nature of the memory leak, this test should be run separately
  from the PhET brand memory leak test. Test with the "console" and "instance proxies" wrappers (easily accessed from phetmarks)

Performance, Usability

• Does the sim perform as desired across the range of supported platforms? (eg, not too slow on slow platforms, not too fast on fast platforms)
• If the sim uses WebGL, does it have a fallback? Does the fallback perform reasonably well? (run with query parameter webgl=false)
• Are UI components sufficiently responsive? (especially continuous UI components, such as sliders)
• Are pointer areas optimized, especially for touch? (run with query parameter showPointerAreas)
• Do pointer areas overlap? (run with query parameter showPointerAreas)

Internationalization

• Are there any strings that are not being internationalized? (run with query parameter stringTest=x, you should see nothing but 'x' strings)
• Does the sim layout gracefully handle internationalized strings that are twice as long as the English strings? (run with query parameter stringTest=double)
• Does the sim layout gracefully handle internationalized strings that are exceptionally long? (run with query parameter stringTest=long)
• Does the sim layout gracefully handle internationalized strings that are shorter than the English strings? (run with query parameter stringTest=X)
• Does the sim stay on the sim page (doesn't redirect to an external page) when running with the query parameter stringTest=xss? This test passes if sim does not redirect, OK if sim crashes or fails to fully start. Only test on one desktop platform.
• Use named placeholders (e.g. "{{value}} {{units}}") instead of numbered placeholders (e.g. "{0} {1}").
• Make sure the string keys are all perfect - they are difficult to change after 1.0.0 is published. Strings keys should generally match their values, such as "binaryProbability": { "value": "Binary Probability" }.
• String keys for screen names should have the general form "screen.{{screenName}}", e.g. "screen.lab".
• String patterns that contain placeholders (e.g. "My name is {{first}} {{last}}") should use keys that are unlikely to conflict with strings that might be needed in the future. For example, for "{{price}}" consider using key "pricePattern" instead of "price", if you think there might be a future need for a "price" string.

Repository structure

• Are all required files and directories present?
  For a sim repository named “my-repo”, the general structure should look like this (where assets/, audio/ or images/ may be omitted if the sim doesn’t have those types of assets).

   my-repo/
      assets/
      audio/
         license.json
      doc/
         model.md
         implementation-notes.md
      images/
         license.json
      js/
         (see section below)
      dependencies.json
      .gitignore
      my-repo_en.html
      my-repo-strings_en.json
      Gruntfile.js
      LICENSE
      package.json
      README.md

For a common-code repository, the structure is similar, but some of the files and directories may not be present if the repo doesn’t have audio, images, strings, or a demo application.

• Is the js/ directory properly structured?
  All JavaScript source should be in the js/ directory. There should be a subdirectory for each screen (this also applies for single-screen sims, where the subdirectory matches the repo name). For a multi-screen sim, code shared by 2 or more screens should be in a js/common/ subdirectory. Model and view code should be in model/ and view/ subdirectories for each screen and common/. For example, for a sim with screens “Introduction” and “Lab”, the general directory structure should look like this:

   my-repo/
      js/
         common/
            model/
            view/
         introduction/
            model/
            view/
         lab/
            model/
            view/
         my-repo-config.js
         my-repo-main.js
         myRepo.js

• Is there a file in assets/ for every resource file in audio/ and images/? Note that there is not necessarily a 1:1 correspondence between asset and resource files; for example, several related images may be in the same .ai file. Check license.json for possible documentation of why some reesources might not have a corresponding asset file.
• Was the README.md generated by grunt published-README or grunt unpublished-README?
• Does package.json refer to any dependencies that are not used by the sim?
• Does sim-config.js refer to any dependencies that are not used by the sim? Note: ifphetio plugin and PHET_IO dependencies should be included in all config files.
• Does package.json contain phetLibs for all non-default entries in sim-config.json?
• Is the LICENSE file correct? (GPL v3 for sims, MIT for common code)
• Does .gitignore match the one in simula-rasa?
• Does a GitHub issue exist for tracking credits, to ensure that they are correct before publication?
• In GitHub, verify that all non-release branches have an associated issue that describes their purpose.
• Are there any GitHub branches that are no longer needed and should be deleted?
• Does model.md adequately describe the model, in terms appropriate for teachers?
• Does implementation-notes.md adequately describe the implementation, with an overview that will be useful to future maintainers?
• Are sim-specific query parameters (if any) identified and documented in one .js file in js/common/ or js/ (if there is no common/)? The .js file should be named {{REPO}}QueryParameters.js, for example ArithmeticQueryParameters.js for the aritmetic repository.

Coding Conventions

• Is the code formatted according to PhET conventions? See phet-idea-code-style.xml for IntelliJ IDEA code style.
• Are copyright headers present and up to date? Run grunt update-copyright-dates.
• Names (types, variables, properties, functions,...) should be sufficiently descriptive and specific, and should avoid non-standard abbreviations. For example:

var numPart;            // incorrect
var numberOfParticles;  // correct

var width;              // incorrect
var beakerWidth;        // correct

• Require statements should be organized into blocks, with the code modules first, followed by strings, images and audio (any order ok for strings/images/audio). For modules, the var name should match the file name. Example below.

// modules
var inherit = require( 'PHET_CORE/inherit' );
var Line = require( 'SCENERY/nodes/Line' );
var Rectangle = require( 'SCENERY/nodes/Rectangle' );

// strings
var kineticString = require( 'string!ENERGY/energy.kinetic' );
var potentialString = require( 'string!ENERGY/energy.potential' );
var thermalString = require( 'string!ENERGY/energy.thermal' );

// images
var energyImage = require( 'image!ENERGY/energy.png' );

// audio
var kineticAudio = require( 'audio!ENERGY/energy' );

• Do the @author annotations seem correct?

• For constructors, use parameters for things that don’t have a default. Use options for things that have a default value. This improves readability at the call site, especially when the number of parameters is large. It also eliminates order dependency that is required by using parameters.

For example, this constructor uses parameters for everything. At the call site, the semantics of the arguments are difficult to determine without consulting the constructor.

/**
 * @param {Ball} ball - model element
 * @param {Property.<boolean>} visibleProperty - is the ball visible?
 * @param {Color|string} fill - fill color
 * @param {Color|string} stroke - stroke color
 * @param {number} lineWidth - width of the stroke
 * @constructor
 */
function BallNode( ball, visibleProperty, fill, stroke, lineWidth ){
   // ...
}

// Call site
var ballNode = new BallNode( ball, visibleProperty, 'blue', 'black', 2 );

Here’s the same constructor with an appropriate use of options. The call site is easier to read, and the order of options is flexible.

/**
 * @param {Ball} ball - model element
 * @param {Property.<boolean>} visibleProperty - is the ball visible?
 * @param {Object} [options]
 * @constructor
 */
function BallNode( ball, visibleProperty, options ) {

  options = _.extend( {
    fill: 'white',  // {Color|string} fill color
    stroke: 'black', // {Color|string} stroke color
    lineWidth: 1 // {number} width of the stroke
  }, options ); 

  // ...
}

// Call site
var ballNode = new BallNode( ball, visibleProperty, {
  fill: 'blue', 
  stroke: 'black', 
  lineWidth: 2 
} );

• Constructor and function documentation. Parameter types and names should be clearly specified for each function and constructor (if there are any parameters) using @param annotations. The description for each parameter should follow a hyphen. Primitive types should use lower case. Constructors should additionally include the @constructor annotation. For example:

/** 
 * The PhetDeveloper is responsible for creating code for simulations
 * and documenting their code thoroughly.
 * 
 * @param {string} name - full name
 * @param {number} age - age, in years
 * @param {boolean} isEmployee - whether this developer is an employee of CU
 * @param {function} callback - called immediate after coffee is consumed
 * @param {Property.<number>} hoursProperty - cumulative hours worked
 * @param {string[]} friendNames - names of friends
 * @param {Object} [options] - optional configuration, see constructor
 * @constructor
 */
function PhetDeveloper( name, age, isEmployee, callback, hoursProperty, friendNames, options ) {}

• For most functions, the same form as above should be used, with a @returns annotation which identifies the return type and the meaning of the returned value. Functions should also document any side effects. For extremely simple functions that are just a few lines of simple code, an abbreviated line-comment can be used, for example: // Computes {Number} distance based on {Foo} foo.

• If references are needed to the enclosing object, such as for a closure, self should be defined, but it should only be used in closures. The self variable should not be defined unless it is needed in a closure. Example:

var self = this;
someProperty.link( function(){
  self.doSomething();
} );
this.doSomethingElse();

• Generally, lines should not exceed 120 columns. Break up long statements, expressions, or comments into multiple
  lines to optimize readability. It is OK for require statements or other structured patterns to exceed 120 columns.
  Use your judgment!

• Where inheritance is needed, use PHET_CORE/inherit. Add prototype and static functions via the appropriate arguments to inherit. Spaces should exist between the function names unless the functions are all short and closely related. Example:

  return inherit( Object, Line, {

   /**
    * Gets the slope of the line
    * @returns {number}
    */
    getSlope: function() {
      if ( this.undefinedSlope() ) {
        return Number.NaN;
      }
      else {
        return this.rise / this.run;
      }
    },

    /**
     * Given x, solve y = m(x - x1) + y1.  Returns NaN if the solution is not unique, or there is no solution (x can't 
     * possibly be on the line.)  This occurs when we have a vertical line, with no run.
     * @param {number} x - the x coordinate
     * @returns {number} the solution
     */
    solveY: function( x ) {
      if ( this.undefinedSlope() ) {
        return Number.NaN;
      }
      else {
        return ( this.getSlope() * ( x - this.x1 ) ) + this.y1;
      }
    }
  } );

• Functions should be invoked using the dot operator rather than the bracket operator. For more details, please see Style question: bracket notation vs dot notation gravity-and-orbits#9. For example:

// avoid
self[ isFaceSmile ? 'smile' : 'frown' ]();

// OK
isFaceSmile ? self.smile() : self.frown();

// OK
if ( isFaceSmile ) {
  self.smile();
}
else {
  self.frown();
}

• It is not uncommon to use conditional shorthand and short circuiting for invocation.

( expression ) && statement;
( expression ) ? statement1 : statement2;
( foo && bar ) ? fooBar() : fooCat();
( foo && bar ) && fooBar();
( foo && !(bar && fooBar)) && nowIAmConfused();
this.fill = ( foo && bar ) ? 'red' : 'blue'; 

If the expression is only one item, the parentheses can be omitted. This is the most common use case.

assert && assert( happy, ‘Why aren\’t you happy?’ );
happy && smile();
var thoughts = happy ? ‘I am happy’ : ‘I am not happy :(’;

• Naming for Property values: All AXON/Property instances should be declared with the suffix Property. For example, if a visible property is added, it should have the name visibleProperty instead of simply visible. This will help to avoid confusion with non-Property definitions.

• Line comments should be preceded by a blank line. For example:

// Randomly choose an existing crystal to possibly bond to
var crystal = this.crystals.get( _.random( this.crystals.length - 1 ) );

// Find a good configuration to have the particles move toward
var targetConfiguration = this.getTargetConfiguration( crystal );

• Line comments should have whitespace between the // and the first letter of the line comment. See the preceding example.

• Differentiate between Property and "property" in comments. They are different things. Property is a type in AXON; property is any value associated with a JavaScript object.

• Files should be named like CapitalizedCamelCasing.js when returning a constructor, or lower-case-style.js when returning a non-constructor function. When returning a constructor, the constructor name should match the filename.

• Every type, method and property should be documented.

• The HTML5/CSS3/JavaScript source code must be reasonably well documented. This is difficult to specify precisely, but the idea is that someone who is moderately experienced with HTML5/CSS5/JavaScript can quickly understand the general function of the source code as well as the overall flow of the code by reading through the comments. For an example of the type of documentation that is required, please see the example-sim repository.

Visibility Annotations

Because JavaScript lacks visibility modifiers (public, protected, private), PhET uses JSdoc visibility annotations to document the intent of the programmer, and define the public API. Visibility annotations are required for anything that JavaScript makes public. Information about these annotations can be found here. (Note that other documentation systems like the Google Closure Compiler use slightly different syntax in some cases. Where there are differences, JSDoc is authoritative. For example, use Array.<Object> or Object[] instead of Array<Object>). PhET guidelines for visibility annotations are as follows:

• Use @public for anything that is intended to be part of the public API.

• Use @protected for anything that is intended for use by subtypes.

• Use @private for anything that is NOT intended to be part of the public or protected API.

• Put qualifiers in parenthesis after the annotation, for example:

• To qualify that something is read-only, use @public (read-only). This indicates that the given property (AND its value) should not be changed by outside code (e.g. a Property should not have its value changed)

• To qualify that something is public to a specific repository, use (for example) @public (scenery-internal)

• Separate multiple qualifiers with commas. For example: @public (scenery-internal, read-only)

• For JSDoc-style comments, the annotation should appear in context like this:

/**
 * Creates the icon for the "Energy" screen, a cartoonish bar graph.
 * @returns {Node}
 * @public
 */

• For Line comments, the annotation can appear like this:

// @public Adds a {function} listener
addListener: function( listener ) { /*...*/ }

• Verify that every JavaScript property and function has a visibility annotation. Here are some helpful regular expressions to search for these declarations as PhET uses them.

• Regex for property assignment like x.y = something: [\w]+\.[\w]+\s=
• Regex for function declarations: [\w]+: function\(

Math Libraries

• Check that dot.Util.roundSymmetric is used instead of Math.round. Math.round does not treat positive and negative numbers symmetrically, see fix nearest-neighbor rounding in Util.toFixed dot#35 (comment).
• DOT/Util.toFixed or DOT/Util.toFixedNumber should be used instead of toFixed. JavaScript's toFixed is notoriously buggy. Behavior differs depending on browser, because the spec doesn't specify whether to round or floor.
• Check that random numbers are generated using phet.joist.random, and are doing so after modules are declared (non-statically). For example, the following methods (and perhaps others) should not be used:

• Math.random
• _.shuffle
• _.sample
• _.random
• new Random()

Organization, Readability, Maintainability

• Does the organization and structure of the code make sense? Do the model and view contain types that you would expect (or guess!) by looking at the sim? Do the names of things correspond to the names that you see in the user interface?
• Are appropriate design patterns used?
• Is inheritance used where appropriate? Does the type hierarchy make sense?
• Is there any unnecessary coupling? (e.g., by passing large objects to constructors, or exposing unnecessary properties/functions)
• Is there too much unnecessary decoupling? (e.g. by passing all of the properties of an object independently instead of passing the object itself)?
• Are the source files reasonable in size? Scrutinize large files with too many responsibilities - can responsibilities be broken into smaller delegates?
• Are any significant chunks of code duplicated? This will be checked manually as well as with https://github.com/danielstjules/jsinspect or grunt find-duplicates
• Is there anything that should be generalized and migrated to common code?
• Are there any TODO or FIXME comments in the code? They should be addressed or promoted to GitHub issues.
• Does the implementation rely on any specific constant values that are likely to change in the future? Identify constants that might be changed in the future. (Use your judgement about which constants are likely candidates.) Does changing the values of these constants break the sim? For example, see allow minimum rows to go to "1" and address dependency on current minimum of "5" plinko-probability#84.
• The simulation should use Property instead of PropertySet.
• Are all dependent properties modeled as DerivedProperty instead of Property?

PhET-iO

• If the simulation is supposed to be instrumented for PhET-iO, please see How to Instrument a PhET Simulation for PhET-iO
  for the PhET-iO development process.

[samreid]

@ariel-phet requested @jonathanolson to code review this when the time is right.

[samreid]

@ariel-phet mentioned that it is sometimes good to have at least dev testing complete before code review.

[ariel-phet]

Clearing assignees until sim is ready for review

[samreid]

Notes for the review:

1. There are TODO (phet-io) or TODO (black-box-study) marked in the source code. In my opinion, these do not need to be resolved prior to publication of 1.0.
2. the circuit-construction-kit-common and circuit-construction-kit-dc and circuit-construction-kit-virtual-lab repos need to be reviewed.
3. circuit-construction-kit-common is partially instrumented for PhET-iO and was once used to publish CCK-Black Box Study as phet-io, but the phet-io has not been kept up to date for CCK-DC 1.0
4. The CircuitElementNode subtypes like BatteryNode, ResistorNode, etc have the same signature because they are invoked dynamically from CircuitLayerNode.initializeCircuitElementType. Currently they look like this:

  /**
   * This constructor is called dynamically and must match the signature of other circuit element nodes.
   * @param {CircuitConstructionKitScreenView|null} circuitConstructionKitScreenView - main screen view, null for icon
   * @param {CircuitLayerNode|null} circuitLayerNode, null for icon
   * @param {Battery} battery
   * @param {Property.<boolean>} showResultsProperty - for consistency with other CircuitElementNode constructors
   * @param {Property.<string>} viewProperty
   * @param {Tandem} tandem
   * @param {Object} [options]
   * @constructor
   */
  function BatteryNode( circuitConstructionKitScreenView, circuitLayerNode, battery, showResultsProperty, viewProperty,
                        tandem, options ) {

It turned out that when BatteryNode is rendering an icon, the circuitConstructionKitScreenView and circuitLayerNode should be null. Should I move these parameters into the options or leave them as required?
(5) A few things are named like CircuitConstructionKitQueryParameters instead of CircuitConstructionKitCommonQueryParameters. Should I add in the Common?
(6) Please read through open issues in https://github.com/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+repo%3Aphetsims%2Fcircuit-construction-kit-common+repo%3Aphetsims%2Fcircuit-construction-kit-dc+-label%3Acck-dc%3A1.1+-label%3Adesign%3Ateaching-resources in case we didn't get to everything before the review started.
(6) CircuitStruct looks mostly related to phet-io and black-box-study and probably doesn't need to be refined for 1.0

[samreid]

Questions for the reviewer:

1. Why do the pointer areas for the schematic elements have to be translated? See Schematic pointer areas are buggy circuit-construction-kit-dc#93

[jonathanolson]

Reminder to add the checklist to the top comment.

[samreid]

Copied top comment so the top comment can become the checklist:

We are hoping to publish this simulation by the end of July, so we should get ready to schedule the code review. Choosing a code reviewer now could also help me when I run into technical issues if I need to consult with someone (even if that is before the code review). Here's my estimate at a timeline as it pertains to the code review:

June 26 code review begins
June 30 code review ends

I'd love to start the code review a week earlier (to give more time to address issues and go through QA) but I doubt the sim will be feature complete by then.

Assigned to @ariel-phet so he is aware of the potential timeline and can start scheduling a reviewer.

[samreid]

I moved the checklist to the top comment so its summary will show in the issue overview.

@jonathanolson this sim is ready for review. Please review #317 (comment) for some comments and questions, and see circuit-construction-kit-common/doc for some high-level documentation.

[samreid]

//REVIEW: Don't see any read/link to this, maybe there is something I'm missing?

At one point we were thinking of highlighting the toolbox when something can be dropped into it, but it was odd that the toolbox highlighted right when a circuit element was dropped out, so we abandoned that idea. I'll remove it.

[jonathanolson]

String keys for screen names should have the general form "screen.{{screenName}}", e.g. "screen.lab".

Keys are 'intro' and 'lab' right now, will need prefixes.

[jonathanolson]

Code review (pending any existing REVIEW notes and issues) is complete.

Looks great!

[samreid]

REVIEW comments and issue comments have been addressed, and remaining work is identified in open issues, closing.