-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do individual particles need to be instrumented? #279
Comments
3/11/21 design meeting @arouinfar @kathy-phet @pixelzoom Re:
Yes. Each particle is dispensed individually at random, and contributes to the solution after it has animated past the surface of the solution and dissolved in solution. Due to this randomness, it's important to record and playback each shaker particle. Re:
Probably not. We couldn't think of a reason to instrument each precipitate particle. They are a qualitative (derived) indicator of the level of saturation, and nothing else is derived from them. In the State Wrapper, it doesn't matter if they are in the exact positions in the downstream sim. |
#279 (comment) indicates that the precipitate particles "probably" do not need to be individually instrumented. But I'm inclined to instrument them because: (1) "Probably not" is not reassuring. |
@arouinfar For the reasons listed in #279 (comment), I'm planning to make no changes here, and keep all particles instrumented. Is that OK with you? If so, you can close this issue. |
@pixelzoom leaving the particles instrumented sounds reasonable. They look fine in the tree, but I also don't plan to feature them. Performance has been fine, even on my phone. |
From #262 (comment):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: