Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add local simulation of deployments support to SDK #12

Closed
2 tasks
peersky opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #22
Closed
2 tasks

Add local simulation of deployments support to SDK #12

peersky opened this issue Mar 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #22
Assignees
Labels
Alpha release Project roadmap item

Comments

@peersky
Copy link
Member

peersky commented Mar 2, 2024

Right now SDK uses getContract and getArtifact functions to get deployment artifacts for various components of smart contract infrastructure on a specific chain.

These must be improved to support local environment simulation:

When "localhost" chain id is supported it:

  • getArtifact returns data from enviroment specified local directory instead of npm package
  • getContract supports new parameter allowing to specify contract name to get from a chain
@peersky peersky changed the title Add simulation environment to sdk Add local simulation environment support Mar 2, 2024
@peersky peersky transferred this issue from peeramid-labs/contracts Mar 2, 2024
@peersky peersky changed the title Add local simulation environment support Add local simulation environment support to SDK Mar 3, 2024
@peersky peersky changed the title Add local simulation environment support to SDK Add local deployment support to SDK Mar 3, 2024
@peersky peersky changed the title Add local deployment support to SDK Add local simulation of deployments support to SDK Mar 3, 2024
@peersky peersky added this to the SDK 0.7 release milestone Mar 3, 2024
@peersky peersky added the Alpha release Project roadmap item label Mar 3, 2024
theKosmoss pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
theKosmoss pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 6, 2024
@peersky peersky linked a pull request May 11, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Alpha release Project roadmap item
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants