refactor: Remove guardrails for mainnet x-chain link claiming and cashouts #408
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces several enhancements to components related to cashout and claim functionalities. Key updates include improved error handling for KYC processes, refined logic for cross-chain transactions, and adjustments to conditional rendering in user interfaces. Components such as Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
panosfilianos
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-341: Summary of changes and potential impactThe main change in this file is the simplification of the condition for displaying the cross-chain claiming warning message. This modification aligns with the PR objective of removing guardrails for mainnet x-chain claiming and cashouts.
While the change itself is relatively small, it could have implications for user experience and functionality:
- The warning message visibility may change for certain chain selections.
- The removal of the specific check for chain ID '1' (presumably Ethereum mainnet) might affect how the component behaves for Ethereum mainnet transactions.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions:
- Update the component's unit tests to cover various scenarios with different chain selections.
- Consider adding integration tests to verify the end-to-end behavior of the cross-chain claiming process.
- Update any relevant documentation or user guides to reflect the changes in warning message visibility.
These steps will help maintain the reliability and consistency of the cross-chain claiming feature while adapting to the new, simplified condition.
⚠️ Chain ID '1' Special Case Handling AffectedThe removal of the specific check for chain ID
'1'impacts multiple areas where it is used as a special identifier for Ethereum. This could lead to unintended side effects in cross-chain functionalities.Affected Files:
src/constants/cashout.consts.tssrc/constants/general.consts.tssrc/hooks/useBalance.tsxsrc/components/Cashout/Components/Confirm.view.tsxsrc/components/Refund/index.tsxsrc/components/Claim/Claim.tsxPlease ensure that the generic condition adequately handles all scenarios previously managed by the specific chain ID
'1'checks or consider retaining the specific checks where necessary.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
312-316: Simplified condition for cross-chain claiming warningThe simplification of the condition for displaying the cross-chain claiming warning is a good improvement. It makes the code more generic and potentially more maintainable.
However, please verify if removing the specific check for chain ID '1' (presumably Ethereum mainnet) is intentional and aligns with the expected behavior.
To ensure this change doesn't introduce any unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
Consider adding a comment above the condition to explain its purpose, for example:
// Display warning if the selected chain doesn't support cross-chain claimingThis will help future developers understand the intent behind this check.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of chain ID '1' special cases in the codebase # Search for occurrences of chain ID '1' being treated as a special case rg --type typescript --type javascript "chainId.*[\"']1[\"']|[\"']1[\"'].*chainId" -g '!*test*'Length of output: 140
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of chain ID '1' special cases in the codebase # Search for occurrences of chain ID '1' being treated as a special case in .ts and .tsx files rg "chainId.*['\"]1['\"]|['\"]1['\"].*chainId" -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.mjs' -g '*.cjs'Length of output: 870
src/components/Claim/Link/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
Line range hint
321-332: Improved error handling for KYC-related issuesThe new conditional rendering for KYC-related error messages is a good addition. It provides more specific feedback to users and offers a support chat option for assistance. This improves the overall user experience when dealing with KYC issues.
Consider extracting the error message strings into constants to improve maintainability and reduce the risk of typos. For example:
const KYC_ERRORS = { UNDER_REVIEW: 'KYC under review', REJECTED: 'KYC rejected' }; // Then use them in the conditionals: errorState.errorMessage === KYC_ERRORS.UNDER_REVIEW
Line range hint
1-332: Overall assessment of changesThe modifications in this file are focused and beneficial. They address a potential runtime issue with the
toLowerCasemethod invocation and enhance the error handling for KYC-related problems. These changes contribute to improved code reliability and a better user experience.As the component grows in complexity, consider breaking it down into smaller, more manageable sub-components. This could improve readability and maintainability in the long run.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Confirm.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx (0 hunks)
- src/components/Claim/Link/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/Claim/Claim.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/Claim/Link/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
65-65: Correct method invocation onclaimLinkData.tokenAddressThe change from
toLowerCasetotoLowerCase()is correct. This ensures that thetoLowerCasemethod is properly called on thetokenAddressstring, fixing a potential runtime error or unexpected behavior.src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (3)
Line range hint
395-399: Approve: Consistent warning message for unsupported chainsThe condition for displaying the warning message has been updated to be more consistent, now showing for all chains not present in
crossChainDetails. This change aligns with the modification in thexchainAllowedvariable.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please test the following scenarios:
- Select a chain that is in
crossChainDetails(warning should not appear)- Select a chain that is not in
crossChainDetails, including chain ID '1' if applicable (warning should appear)- Verify that the
Proceedbutton is disabled when the warning is shownRun the following script to check the structure of
crossChainDetails:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the structure of crossChainDetails rg --type typescript -A 10 'crossChainDetails\s*='
Line range hint
1-399: Summary: Refactoring of cross-chain support logicThe changes in this file are part of the larger effort to remove guardrails for mainnet x-chain claiming and cashouts. The main modifications include:
- Simplification of the
xchainAllowedlogic.- Consistent warning message display for unsupported chains.
These changes align with the PR objectives but may have implications for certain chain IDs, especially '1'.
To ensure the refactoring doesn't introduce unintended side effects:
- Verify that the behavior for chain ID '1' is as expected after these changes.
- Test the cashout flow for both supported and unsupported chains to confirm the correct functionality.
- Review the overall impact on the user experience, especially for users on previously supported chains that might now be considered unsupported.
Run the following script to check for any remaining references to special handling of chain ID '1':
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for special handling of chain ID '1' rg --type typescript "selectedChainID.*===.*['\"]1['\"]"
43-46: Verify the impact of simplifiedxchainAllowedlogicThe
xchainAllowedvariable now only checks for the existence of the selected chain incrossChainDetails. This simplification might affect the behavior for chain ID '1' if it was previously handled as a special case.Please confirm that this change is intentional and doesn't negatively impact the functionality for chain ID '1'. Run the following script to check the usage of
xchainAllowed:✅ Verification successful
Simplified
xchainAllowedLogic VerifiedThe change to
xchainAllowedis localized withinInitial.view.tsxand does not impact other parts of the codebase. Ensure that chain ID '1' is intentionally handled as per the updated logic.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of xchainAllowed variable rg --type typescript -A 5 'xchainAllowed'Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the usage of xchainAllowed variable in TypeScript and TSX files rg --type tsx -A 5 'xchainAllowed' || rg --type ts -A 5 'xchainAllowed'Length of output: 1118
src/components/Cashout/Components/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
246-246: LGTM!The updated function call to
utils.fetchRouteRawis correct and the parameters are appropriately passed.
| @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ export const ConfirmCashoutView = ({ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| const route = await utils.fetchRouteRaw( | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress.toLowerCase(), | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Q: why is this removed? aren't we running the risk of wrong string comparison?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a function spec moment at this point. The idea is that lowering takes place as part of fetchRouteRaw() logic. This way the function can support case agnosting addresses and .toLowerCase() is called in the function w/o need of pre-processing before.
| const xchainAllowed = useMemo( (): boolean => { | ||
| return crossChainDetails.find((chain: any) => chain.chainId.toString() === selectedChainID.toString()) != undefined | ||
| }, | ||
| [selectedChainID] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion: would be good to have a comment explaining what this code actually does
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(ie: checking if we support x-chain on that chain)
| @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ export const ConfirmClaimLinkIbanView = ({ | |||
| let route | |||
| try { | |||
| route = await utils.fetchRouteRaw( | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress.toLowerCase, | |||
| @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ export const ConfirmClaimLinkIbanView = ({ | |||
| let route | |||
| try { | |||
| route = await utils.fetchRouteRaw( | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress.toLowerCase, | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress.toLowerCase(), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
TODO: Why is this lowercase kept but the other one removed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please refer to the comment above: utils.fetchRouteRaw() is left to do the processing of the string inside its logic. No expectation of a case on the string params on case. This minimises errors (eg. someone forgets to minimize when passing - we can't type check that easily) and gives the fetchRouteRaw() more flexibility in the future, should another case is needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i.e. I'm pushing a commit that removes that as well!
| @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ export const ConfirmCashoutView = ({ | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| const route = await utils.fetchRouteRaw( | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress.toLowerCase(), | |||
| claimLinkData.tokenAddress, | |||
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
User Interface Adjustments