Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly set v=2 query parameter for v2 senders #320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

spacebear21
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #311.

The modified test in the first commit fails without the changes in the second commit.

@spacebear21 spacebear21 requested a review from DanGould July 9, 2024 20:47
@DanGould
Copy link
Contributor

DanGould commented Jul 9, 2024

I'd like to see the commits squashed or have their order reversed so that we can reduce the number of known failing test states in our main branch. That way we can git bisect later and expect tests to pass

@DanGould DanGould added this to the payjoin-0.19.0 milestone Jul 9, 2024
payjoin/src/receive/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@spacebear21 spacebear21 marked this pull request as draft July 10, 2024 17:55
@spacebear21 spacebear21 marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2024 19:01
@DanGould
Copy link
Contributor

tACK but now we've a conflict since serialize_url was changed in #300

Closes payjoin#311. Set `v=2` in HTTP query string parameters when serializing
v2 sender requests.
@spacebear21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Rebased

Copy link
Contributor

@DanGould DanGould left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@DanGould DanGould merged commit c3ac51f into payjoin:master Jul 11, 2024
4 checks passed
@DanGould DanGould mentioned this pull request Jul 18, 2024
17 tasks
@DanGould
Copy link
Contributor

Does this make #144 feasible?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

V2 requests are mistakenly being interpreted as v1 requests in params
2 participants