Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is "flame.description" a thing/available? #387

Open
vitaprimo opened this issue Aug 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Is "flame.description" a thing/available? #387

vitaprimo opened this issue Aug 27, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@vitaprimo
Copy link

Deployment details:

  • App version [e.g. v1.7.4]: 2.3.0
  • Platform [e.g. amd64, arm64, arm/v7]: amd64
  • Docker image tag [e.g. latest, multiarch]: pawelmalak/flame: (/latest)

Bug description:

No bug, well, maybe… gun to my head—none of the little icons for which you enter a keyword show, instead " 🚫 " shows (but in Unicode/vectorGraphics, not emoji).

That said, my firewall is too strict, it blocks a lot of things collecting analytics (like CDNs) and, the reverse proxy injects a CSP to block getting things from third party domains, anyway. I'll design my own icons, it's a non-issue. :)


Steps to reproduce:

  1. It's more like a question-slash-feature request. The labels; there's one for each field in the web app, except for description. Which, according to the guide, trumps URL if the former were to exist. I'm sort of speculating it's not a label because it conflicts with URL or that it was just forgotten to be documented. I better ask.

Is flame.description a valid label? If not, is there an equivalent? What happens if I modify an entry that was automatically generated through labels, BTW?


Thanks for sharing your app; I love it bc it's featured enough to be useful, but not so much that's cumbersome..or tacky.

@jflattery
Copy link

This is not currently implemented but there is already an open issue for this at #297

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants