Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clarify scope is not just browser features #3

Open
npdoty opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

clarify scope is not just browser features #3

npdoty opened this issue Oct 29, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@npdoty
Copy link
Contributor

npdoty commented Oct 29, 2021

Discussions at the initial teleconference made clear that participants are interested in private advertising technology beyond implementation just in web browsers/user agents and operating systems.

In particular, mobile apps that use web technologies (embedded web views, HTTP requests, etc.) and trusted server and server governance/audits were particularly proposed as relevant work items.

User- or client-facing technology seems in scope. Advertising server-to-server communication standards seem to be not the focus of the group.

We should come up with clearer text for the initial sections of the charter so as not to confuse potential participants.

@AramZS
Copy link
Contributor

AramZS commented Nov 1, 2021

I am definitely open to making this clearer. Do you have an idea on how to rewrite the relevant text?

@npdoty
Copy link
Contributor Author

npdoty commented Dec 21, 2021

One proposal, replace the initial two paragraphs of "Scope" with:

The Community Group will incubate new web platform features to support web advertising and provide users with privacy with a strong technical basis. Features may be designed for implementation by user agents — including non-browser agents like operating systems or mobile apps that use web technologies — and by servers providing client-facing functionality.

And expand "Out of Scope":

Features that support advertising but provide privacy by means that are primarily non-technical and features that are server-to-server without a user-facing component should be proposed elsewhere.

I'm not strongly wedded to any of this, I'm just trying to accurately capture what participants are already assuming will be worked on in this CG and what won't be.

@seanturner
Copy link
Contributor

@npdoty this is definitely something that we should clarify.

@npdoty
Copy link
Contributor Author

npdoty commented Feb 11, 2022

Maybe this change would help address #5 as well.

Should I open a PR with the change in #3 (comment)?

@AramZS
Copy link
Contributor

AramZS commented Feb 28, 2022

@npdoty I think this makes sense. Could you issue a PR, we'll have it open to any feedback by the group for a little while and then close it if there are no objections on the next call.

npdoty added a commit to npdoty/patcg.github.io that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2022
Addressing patcg#3, clarify that features may include both client and server implementation, but are client-facing in some way.
@AramZS AramZS linked a pull request Apr 7, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants