Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixes USARTSerial::availableForWrite() behavior #1020

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2016
Merged

Fixes USARTSerial::availableForWrite() behavior #1020

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 10, 2016

Conversation

avtolstoy
Copy link
Member

@avtolstoy avtolstoy commented Jun 7, 2016 •
edited by technobly
Loading

Fixes #1017

wiring/serial_loopback includes a test SERIAL1_AvailableForWriteWorksCorrectly to verify correct availableForWrite() behavior.

Doneness:

  • Contributor has signed CLA
  • Problem and Solution clearly stated
  • Code peer reviewed
  • API tests compiled
  • Run unit/integration/application tests on device
  • Add documentation
  • Add to CHANGELOG.md after merging (add links to docs and issues)

@avtolstoy
Fixes typo in USART::availableForWrite() and availableForWrite() beha…
cf409a5 
…vior in general

Test SERIAL1_AvailableForWriteWorksCorrectly added to wiring/serial_loopback
@avtolstoy avtolstoy changed the title Fixes USART::availableForWrite() behavior Fixes USARTSerial::availableForWrite() behavior Jun 7, 2016
@m-mcgowan m-mcgowan added this to the 0.6.x milestone Jun 7, 2016
@avtolstoy avtolstoy added bug and removed bug labels Jun 7, 2016
@technobly technobly merged commit 0aecea4 into develop Jun 10, 2016
@technobly technobly removed their assignment Jun 10, 2016
@technobly technobly deleted the feature/usart-availableforwrite branch October 27, 2016 17:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6.x
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@avtolstoy @technobly @m-mcgowan