Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: Upgrade ldapjs from 2.3.3 to 3.0.7 #8869

Conversation

parseplatformorg
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade ldapjs from 2.3.3 to 3.0.7.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


Warning: This is a major version upgrade, and may be a breaking change.

  • The recommended version is 8 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2023-12-01.
Release notes
Package name: ldapjs from ldapjs GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: ldapjs

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Copy link

I will reformat the title to use the proper commit message syntax.

@parse-github-assistant parse-github-assistant bot changed the title [Snyk] Upgrade ldapjs from 2.3.3 to 3.0.7 refactor: Upgrade ldapjs from 2.3.3 to 3.0.7 Jan 3, 2024
Copy link

Thanks for opening this pull request!

  • ❌ Please link an issue that describes the reason for this pull request, otherwise your pull request will be closed. Make sure to write it as Closes: #123 in the PR description, so I can recognize it.

@mtrezza mtrezza closed this Jan 8, 2024
@mtrezza mtrezza deleted the snyk-upgrade-e3702486d643cd550157a1db9389a342 branch January 8, 2024 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants