This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
Validate MultiLocation
for asset-registry
#224
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
46ff168
Validate location for register_reserve_asset
valentinfernandez1 a9eccf9
fmt
valentinfernandez1 8ccaf79
fmt
valentinfernandez1 63318ba
fmt
valentinfernandez1 cda8efe
validator refactor
valentinfernandez1 9da09ef
fmt
valentinfernandez1 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we add one more tests to validate relay chain native token?
MultiLocation { parents: 1, interior: Here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using
Here
will not work since the check is based on how this is suggested by the XCM-Format.In order for that to work it would need to be
MultiLocation { parents: 1, interior: PalletInstance(4)}
where the id 4 references the rococo pallet balances.So I'm not sure whether we should tweak the validation or maybe I`m missing something. Including that is pretty simple but I just want to make sure that we are getting it right conceptually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But in PolkadotJS we are allowed to choose
Here
for the Concrete identifiers.My guess is that it should work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's fixed with the commit I added yesterday.
If the Junctions is
Here
the functionsplit_interior()
will returnNone
.