Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

libp2p networking seemingly ignores bootnodes #361

Closed
gavofyork opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

libp2p networking seemingly ignores bootnodes #361

gavofyork opened this issue Jul 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
I3-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior.

Comments

@gavofyork
Copy link
Member

It should always attempt to connect to every bootnode, and in trying to maintain its minimum peer count, continue reconnecting (without being irresponsible).
@gavofyork gavofyork changed the title libp2p ignores bootnodes libp2p networking seemingly ignores bootnodes Jul 18, 2018
@gavofyork gavofyork added the I3-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior. label Jul 18, 2018
@tomaka
Copy link
Contributor

tomaka commented Jul 18, 2018

Should be fixed in #364

@gavofyork
Copy link
Member Author

yup

liuchengxu pushed a commit to chainx-org/substrate that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2021
Merge pull request paritytech#361 from chainpool/feature/new_multisig
01b8e45 
Feature/new multisig
liuchengxu pushed a commit to chainx-org/substrate that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2021
@koushiro
Fix gateway-bitcoin benchmarks (paritytech#361)
2f9554a 
Signed-off-by: koushiro <[email protected]>
helin6 pushed a commit to boolnetwork/substrate that referenced this issue Jul 25, 2023
@jsdw @niklasad1 @emostov
Expand the subscribe_and_watch example (paritytech#361)
dd9bb11 
* Expand the subscribe_and_watch example

* Fix comment typos

Co-authored-by: Niklas Adolfsson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Mostov <[email protected]>

* Add note about error on decoding events

Co-authored-by: Niklas Adolfsson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Zeke Mostov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
I3-bug The node fails to follow expected behavior.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gavofyork @tomaka