Send balance when contract doesn't exist #5664
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xermicus
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2024
| #[test] | ||
| fn calling_plain_account_fails() { | ||
| fn calling_plain_account_is_balance_transfer() { |
pgherveou
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2024
Co-authored-by: Cyrill Leutwiler <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #5577
I decided to bubble up the error from where we actually try to load the contract info. This helps to make sure that we don't miss some entry point by accident. The draw back is that we have to live with some additional
.expect.@pgherveou With this logic the proxy and its runtime part should be completely unaware whether something is a contract call or a balance transfer. They should just route everything into pallet_revive.