-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 707
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix benchmark failures when using insecure_zero_ed
flag
#5354
Merged
bkchr
merged 2 commits into
paritytech:master
from
moonbeam-foundation:p-tarekkma/use-balances-flag-in-benchmarks
Aug 28, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ | ||
# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0 | ||
# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json | ||
|
||
title: Fix benchmark failures when using insecure_zero_ed flag | ||
|
||
doc: | ||
- audience: Runtime Dev | ||
description: | | ||
Currently, when the pallet is compiled with the insecure_zero_ed flag, benchmarks fail because the minimum balance is set to zero. | ||
|
||
The PR aims to resolve this issue by implementing a placeholder value for the minimum balance when the insecure_zero_ed flag is active. it ensures that benchmarks run successfully regardless of whether this flag is used or not | ||
|
||
crates: | ||
- name: pallet-balances | ||
bump: minor |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is not really correct, min balance is
0
in this case. I would rather fix specifically failing bench/es. this might lead to a wrong benchmark at least withinsecure_zero_ed
feature enabledThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't check all of them, but most of them are just using this to set some balance or whatever. I don't think there is any problem in using
100
if the ED is zero.