-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove pallet-getter
usage from pallet-session
#4972
Merged
+83
−53
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6def7f1
Remove pallet-getter usage from pallet-session
mittal-parth b33e624
Add PR doc
mittal-parth c4ef1d8
Add empty space at end of prdoc
mittal-parth 59df1eb
Merge branch 'master' into remove-getters-session
mittal-parth f153efe
Merge branch 'master' into remove-getters-session
bkchr File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0 | ||
# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json | ||
|
||
title: "Remove `pallet::getter` usage from pallet-session" | ||
|
||
doc: | ||
- audience: Runtime Dev | ||
description: | | ||
This PR removes the `pallet::getter`s from `pallet-session`. | ||
The syntax `StorageItem::<T, I>::get()` should be used instead. | ||
|
||
crates: | ||
- name: pallet-session | ||
bump: minor |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can already mark these as deprecated, and our codebase will be fine right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean not using the
validators
function?It is being used in a lot of places outside of the session pallet like this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would say that deprecating the compatibility functions and changing them within the sdk is in scope for this PR. I had a quick flick through a couple of PRs from the linked issue and others have replaced usage of getters outside the pallet in similar situations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a little dependent. Even I had two ways on this. Some PRs have changed, some haven't. If this sounds, good I can replace all instances (outside the pallet as well).
cc: @kianenigma