Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fixed link #4539

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

fixed link #4539

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion bridges/modules/grandpa/README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ It'd be better for anyone (for chain and for submitters) to reject all transacti
already known headers to the pallet. This way, we leave block space to other useful transactions and
we don't charge concurrent submitters for their honest actions.

To deal with that, we have a [signed extension](./src/call_ext) that may be added to the runtime.
To deal with that, we have a [signed extension](./src/call_ext.rs) that may be added to the runtime.
It does exactly what is required - rejects all transactions with already known headers. The submitter
pays nothing for such transactions - they're simply removed from the transaction pool, when the block
is built.
Expand Down
Loading