-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 680
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assets: can_decrease/increase for destroying asset is not successful #3286
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
665f828
balance for destroying asset cannot be increased/decreased
muharem 1ebb8c1
tests
muharem 7cd9212
prdoc
muharem a769f7e
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem d25c34d
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem f500f6f
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem 1ab5e69
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem 0505854
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem fdf2517
fix conflict merge typo
muharem 8009548
fix conflict merge typo
muharem b1ff968
Merge branch 'master' into muharem-assets-destroy-lock
muharem File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | ||
# Schema: Polkadot SDK PRDoc Schema (prdoc) v1.0.0 | ||
# See doc at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/master/prdoc/schema_user.json | ||
|
||
title: "Assets: can_decrease/increase for destroying asset is not successful" | ||
|
||
doc: | ||
- audience: Runtime Dev | ||
description: | | ||
Functions `can_decrease` and `can_increase` do not return successful consequence results | ||
for assets undergoing destruction; instead, they return the `UnknownAsset` consequence variant. | ||
This update aligns their behavior with similar functions, such as `reducible_balance`, | ||
`increase_balance`, `decrease_balance`, and `burn`, which return an `AssetNotLive` error | ||
for assets in the process of being destroyed. | ||
|
||
crates: | ||
- name: pallet-assets |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: I'd use
matches!
instead of==
. Same for usage below.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the benefit? with
==
I follow the style within the functionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pattern matching is the standard way of comparing
enum
s and it doesn't requirePartialEq
/Eq
, but in this case it's not a big deal.