-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split and migrate origin/bridges-v2
branch
#2976
Milestone
Comments
6 tasks
This was referenced May 16, 2024
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to paritytech/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2024
Contains mainly changes/nits/refactors related to the relayer code (`client-substrate` and `lib-substrate-relay`) migrated from the Bridges V2 [branch](#4427). Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Companion: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2988 ## TODO - [x] fix comments ## Questions - [x] Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is the ultimate test? @svyatonik - [x] check [comment](#4494 (comment)) for more testing --------- Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
6 tasks
migrated to several PRs |
12 tasks
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to paritytech/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Jul 11, 2024
…cations (#4935) ## Summary This PR contains migrated code from the Bridges V2 [branch](#4427) from the old `parity-bridges-common` [repo](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/tree/bridges-v2). Even though the PR looks large, it does not (or should not) contain any significant changes (also not relevant for audit). This PR is a requirement for permissionless lanes, as they were implemented on top of these changes. ## TODO - [x] generate fresh weights for BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-fellows` bridges zombienet tests with actual runtime 1.2.5. or 1.2.6 to check compatibility - ☑️ working, checked with 1.2.8 fellows BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests - ☑️ with old relayer in CI (1.6.5) - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests (locally) - with the relayer based on this branch - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] check/fix relayer companion in bridges repo - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] extract pruning stuff to separate PR #4944 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2451 --------- Signed-off-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
to paritytech/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Jul 12, 2024
…cations (#4935) ## Summary This PR contains migrated code from the Bridges V2 [branch](#4427) from the old `parity-bridges-common` [repo](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/tree/bridges-v2). Even though the PR looks large, it does not (or should not) contain any significant changes (also not relevant for audit). This PR is a requirement for permissionless lanes, as they were implemented on top of these changes. ## TODO - [x] generate fresh weights for BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-fellows` bridges zombienet tests with actual runtime 1.2.5. or 1.2.6 to check compatibility - ☑️ working, checked with 1.2.8 fellows BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests - ☑️ with old relayer in CI (1.6.5) - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests (locally) - with the relayer based on this branch - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] check/fix relayer companion in bridges repo - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] extract pruning stuff to separate PR #4944 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2451 --------- Signed-off-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
TomaszWaszczyk
pushed a commit
to TomaszWaszczyk/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Jul 13, 2024
…cations (paritytech#4935) ## Summary This PR contains migrated code from the Bridges V2 [branch](paritytech#4427) from the old `parity-bridges-common` [repo](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/tree/bridges-v2). Even though the PR looks large, it does not (or should not) contain any significant changes (also not relevant for audit). This PR is a requirement for permissionless lanes, as they were implemented on top of these changes. ## TODO - [x] generate fresh weights for BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-fellows` bridges zombienet tests with actual runtime 1.2.5. or 1.2.6 to check compatibility - ☑️ working, checked with 1.2.8 fellows BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests - ☑️ with old relayer in CI (1.6.5) - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests (locally) - with the relayer based on this branch - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] check/fix relayer companion in bridges repo - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] extract pruning stuff to separate PR paritytech#4944 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2451 --------- Signed-off-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
TarekkMA
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2024
Contains mainly changes/nits/refactors related to the relayer code (`client-substrate` and `lib-substrate-relay`) migrated from the Bridges V2 [branch](paritytech#4427). Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Companion: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2988 ## TODO - [x] fix comments ## Questions - [x] Do we need more testing for client V2 stuff? If so, how/what is the ultimate test? @svyatonik - [x] check [comment](paritytech#4494 (comment)) for more testing --------- Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
TarekkMA
pushed a commit
to moonbeam-foundation/polkadot-sdk
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2024
…cations (paritytech#4935) ## Summary This PR contains migrated code from the Bridges V2 [branch](paritytech#4427) from the old `parity-bridges-common` [repo](https://github.com/paritytech/parity-bridges-common/tree/bridges-v2). Even though the PR looks large, it does not (or should not) contain any significant changes (also not relevant for audit). This PR is a requirement for permissionless lanes, as they were implemented on top of these changes. ## TODO - [x] generate fresh weights for BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-fellows` bridges zombienet tests with actual runtime 1.2.5. or 1.2.6 to check compatibility - ☑️ working, checked with 1.2.8 fellows BridgeHubs - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests - ☑️ with old relayer in CI (1.6.5) - [x] run `polkadot-sdk` bridges zombienet tests (locally) - with the relayer based on this branch - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] check/fix relayer companion in bridges repo - paritytech/parity-bridges-common#3022 - [x] extract pruning stuff to separate PR paritytech#4944 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2976 Relates to: paritytech/parity-bridges-common#2451 --------- Signed-off-by: Branislav Kontur <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Svyatoslav Nikolsky <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: command-bot <>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
origin/bridges-v2
contains dynamic lanes stuff, so we need to migrate it:polkadot-sdk
repo above master branchPossible solution 1:
origin/bridges-v2
so it reflects actual bridgesmaster
structure for relayer codeorigin/bridges-v2-relayer
origin/bridges-v2
so it reflects actual polkadot-sdkmaster
structure for runtime code in./bridges
substreeorigin/bridges-v2-runtime
Possible solution 2:
origin/bridges-v2
manually ignoring those with bumping cratesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: