Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some adjustments to versi tooling #167

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

michalkucharczyk
Copy link

Adjustments to the versi tooling which is a follow-up of paritytech/polkadot-sdk#1256.

},
"configuration": {
"config": {
"scheduling_lookahead": 2,
Copy link
Author

@michalkucharczyk michalkucharczyk Mar 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any corresponding parameter that replaces this? (best to see the diff w/o whitespaces).

@michalkucharczyk
Copy link
Author

cc: @altonen

@altonen
Copy link

altonen commented Mar 5, 2024

I wonder is there something wrong with merging Versi overrides with Rococo chainspec. If I call build-spec for chainspec-rococo-staging-plain.json, it works but if I call build-spec for chainspec-plain.json, I get the following error:

2024-03-05 14:11:27 Building chain spec
Error:
   0: Other: Error parsing spec file: expected value at line 253 column 5

  ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ BACKTRACE ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
                                ⋮ 5 frames hidden ⋮
   6: <core::result::Result<T,F> as core::ops::try_trait::FromResidual<core::result::Result<core::convert::Infallible,E>>>::from_residual::h2448ea279a46891e
      at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/result.rs:1963
   7: polkadot::main::h207b72b9e2003354
      at /builds/parity/mirrors/polkadot-sdk/polkadot/src/main.rs:31
   8: core::ops::function::FnOnce::call_once::hc88137fa2e13fa37
      at /rustc/82e1608dfa6e0b5569232559e3d385fea5a93112/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:250
                                ⋮ 14 frames hidden ⋮

Are you able to reproduce this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants