Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: add RFC to promote ubi-nodejs-extension #309

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

doc: add RFC to promote ubi-nodejs-extension #309

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

mhdawson
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson commented Nov 26, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Summary

RFC to promote ubi-nodejs-extension

Use Cases

Checklist

  • I have viewed, signed, and submitted the Contributor License Agreement.
  • I have linked issue(s) that this PR should close using keywords or the Github UI (See docs)
  • I have added an integration test, if necessary.
  • I have reviewed the styleguide for guidance on my code quality.
  • I'm happy with the commit history on this PR (I have rebased/squashed as needed).

@mhdawson mhdawson requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2024 18:52
pacostas
pacostas approved these changes Nov 27, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@pacostas pacostas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ForestEckhardt ForestEckhardt ForestEckhardt left review comments

@pacostas pacostas pacostas approved these changes

@paketo-bot-reviewer paketo-bot-reviewer Awaiting requested review from paketo-bot-reviewer paketo-bot-reviewer is a code owner automatically assigned from paketo-buildpacks/nodejs-maintainers

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mhdawson @pacostas @ForestEckhardt